Clinical studies on multimodal pain therapy. Standardized measurement of therapy outcomes with a core outcome set

被引:0
|
作者
Deckert, S. [1 ]
Sabatowski, R. [1 ,2 ]
Schmitt, J. [1 ]
Kaiser, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Univ SchmerzCtr, Fetscherstr 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Klin & Poliklin Anasthesiol & Intens Therapie, Dresden, Germany
来源
SCHMERZ | 2016年 / 30卷 / 06期
关键词
Chronic pain; Pain management; Treatment outcome; Patient outcome assessment; Health services research; LOW-BACK-PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY TREATMENT; IMMPACT RECOMMENDATIONS; REHABILITATION PROGRAMS; DOMAINS; FIBROMYALGIA; EFFICACY; DELPHI; DOCUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-016-0123-8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Decision making in evidence-based medicine is based on general data on therapy outcomes as well as the effectiveness and safety in specific patient populations. Typically, findings concerning therapy outcomes from different studies are aggregated for a final conclusion. In this context a comparison of results is hampered by studies in which therapy outcomes are heterogeneously measured. Such methodological challenges exist for almost all areas of medical treatment, as well as for multimodal pain therapy (MMPT). Through establishing core outcome sets (COS) the required standardization of measurement of therapy outcomes in clinical research can be achieved. A COS is an evidence-based and consented minimum set consisting of outcome domains (i.e. partial aspects of the medical condition to be investigated, which have to be measured in order to give the best possible demonstration of therapy outcome of an intervention) accomplished by valid, reliable and sensitive measurement instruments which should be applied in each clinical trial. No such COS has so far been found for MMPT. The aim of this article is to give an overview about currently recommended methodological approaches to develop a COS accompanied by a brief introduction about existing COS initiatives focusing on chronic pain. The existing COS recommendations are discussed and conclusions are drawn on whether existing recommendations could also be applied for MMPT. Finally, the impact of healthcare research in Germany on a standardized assessment of therapy outcome in MMPT is outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 548
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Klinische Studien zur multimodalen SchmerztherapieStandardisierte Therapieeffektmessung mit einem „Core Outcome Set“Clinical studies on multimodal pain therapyStandardized measurement of therapy outcomes with a core outcome set
    S. Deckert
    R. Sabatowski
    J. Schmitt
    U. Kaiser
    Der Schmerz, 2016, 30 (6) : 537 - 548
  • [2] Multimodal pain therapy. Current situation
    Kaiser, U.
    Sabatowski, R.
    Azad, S. C.
    SCHMERZ, 2015, 29 (05): : 550 - 556
  • [3] Structure and process quality of multimodal pain therapy. Results of a survey of pain therapy clinics
    Nagel, B.
    Pfingsten, M.
    Brinkschmidt, T.
    Casser, H. -R.
    Gralow, I.
    Irnich, D.
    Klimczyk, K.
    Sabatowski, R.
    Schiltenwolf, M.
    Sittl, R.
    Soellner, W.
    Arnold, B.
    SCHMERZ, 2012, 26 (06): : 661 - +
  • [4] Developing a core outcome domain set to assessing effectiveness of interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: the VAPAIN consensus statement on core outcome domains
    Kaiser, Ulrike
    Kopkow, Christian
    Deckert, Stefanie
    Neustadt, Katrin
    Jacobi, Lena
    Cameron, Paul
    De Angelis, Valerio
    Apfelbacher, Christian
    Arnold, Bernhard
    Birch, Judy
    Bjarnegard, Anna
    Christiansen, Sandra
    Williams, Amanda C. de C.
    Gossrau, Gudrun
    Heinks, Andrea
    Hueppe, Michael
    Kiers, Henri
    Kleinert, Ursula
    Martelletti, Paolo
    McCracken, Lance
    de Meij, Nelleke
    Nagel, Bernd
    Nijs, Jo
    Norda, Heike
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Spengler, Ellen
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Tugwell, Peter
    Vlaeyen, Johan W. S.
    Wandrey, Heike
    Neugebauer, Edmund
    Sabatowski, Rainer
    Schmitt, Jochen
    PAIN, 2018, 159 (04) : 673 - 683
  • [5] A systematic review of the outcomes reported in multimodal pain therapy for chronic pain
    Deckert, S.
    Kaiser, U.
    Kopkow, C.
    Trautmann, F.
    Sabatowski, R.
    Schmitt, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 20 (01) : 51 - 63
  • [6] Multidisciplinary assessment for multimodal pain therapy. Indications and range of performance
    Casser, H. -R.
    Arnold, B.
    Gralow, I.
    Irnich, D.
    Klimczyk, K.
    Nagel, B.
    Pfingsten, M.
    Schiltenwolf, M.
    Sittl, R.
    Soellner, W.
    SCHMERZ, 2013, 27 (04): : 363 - 370
  • [7] From GRIP to multimodal pain therapy. A concept asserts itself
    Hildebrandt, J.
    Pfingsten, M.
    ORTHOPADE, 2009, 38 (10): : 885 - +
  • [8] Validation of a core patient-reported-outcome measure set for operationalizing success in multimodal pain therapy: useful for depicting long-term success?
    Donath, Carolin
    Geiss, Christa
    Schoen, Christoph
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [9] Validation of a core patient-reported-outcome measure set for operationalizing success in multimodal pain therapy: useful for depicting long-term success?
    Carolin Donath
    Christa Geiß
    Christoph Schön
    BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [10] Validation and application of a core set of patient-relevant outcome domains to assess the effectiveness of multimodal pain therapy (VAPAIN): a study protocol
    Kaiser, Ulrike
    Kopkow, Christian
    Deckert, Stefanie
    Sabatowski, Rainer
    Schmitt, Jochen
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (11):