Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners

被引:92
作者
Pauwels, Ruben [1 ]
Beinsberger, Jilke [1 ]
Stamatakis, Harry [2 ]
Tsiklakis, Kostas [2 ]
Walker, Adrian [3 ]
Bosmans, Hilde [4 ]
Bogaerts, Ria [5 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ]
Horner, Keith [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louvain, Fac Med, Oral Imaging Ctr, Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Athens, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Diag & Oral Radiol, Athens, Greece
[3] Leeds Test Objects, Boroughbridge, England
[4] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Louvain, Belgium
[5] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Expt Radiotherapy, Louvain, Belgium
[6] Univ Manchester, Sch Dent, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY | 2012年 / 114卷 / 01期
关键词
SUBJECTIVE IMAGE QUALITY; DENTAL USE; CT; RADIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oooo.2012.01.020
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. The purpose was to evaluate the perceived spatial and contrast resolution for a wide range of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices. Study Design. A customized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantom was developed. Inserts containing a line-pair and rod pattern were used. The phantom was scanned with 13 CBCT devices and 1 multislice CT (MSCT) device using a variety of scanning protocols. The images were presented to 4 observers for scoring. Results. The observer scores showed excellent agreement. A wide range was seen in image quality between CBCT exposure protocols. Compared with the average CBCT scores, the MSCT protocols scored lower for the line-pair insert but higher for the rod insert. Conclusions. CBCT devices are generally suitable for the visualization of high-contrast structures. Certain exposure protocols can be used for depicting low-contrast structures or fine details. The user should be able to select appropriate exposure protocols according to varying diagnostic requirements. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;114:127-135)
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption [J].
Alqerban, Ali ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde ;
Fieuws, Steffen ;
Willems, Guy .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (01) :93-102
[2]  
Dreiseidler T, 2009, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V24, P216
[3]   Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography [J].
Hashimoto, K. ;
Kawashima, S. ;
Kameoka, S. ;
Akiyama, Y. ;
Honjoya, T. ;
Ejima, K. ;
Sawada, K. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2007, 36 (08) :465-471
[4]   A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine [J].
Hashimoto, K ;
Arai, Y ;
Iwai, K ;
Araki, M ;
Kawashima, S ;
Terakado, M .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2003, 95 (03) :371-377
[5]   Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology [J].
Horner, K. ;
Islam, M. ;
Flygare, L. ;
Tsiklakis, K. ;
Whaites, E. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 38 (04) :187-195
[6]   Image quality produced by different cone-beam computed tomography settings [J].
Kwong, Jeffrey C. ;
Palomo, J. Martin ;
Landers, Michael A. ;
Figueroa, Alex ;
Hans, Mark G. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 133 (02) :317-327
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[8]   A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality [J].
Liang, Xin ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde ;
Hassan, Bassam ;
Li, Limin ;
Pauwels, Ruben ;
Corpas, Livia ;
Souza, Paulo Couto ;
Martens, Wendy ;
Shahbazian, Maryam ;
Alonso, Arie ;
Lambrichts, Ivo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) :265-269
[9]   Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view [J].
Lofthag-Hansen, Sara ;
Thilander-Klang, Anne ;
Grondahl, Kerstin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (02) :483-488
[10]   Image quality vs radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners [J].
Loubele, M. ;
Jacobs, R. ;
Maes, F. ;
Denis, K. ;
White, S. ;
Coudyzer, W. ;
Lambrichts, I. ;
van Steenberghe, D. ;
Suetens, P. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (06) :309-318