Importance of Donor-Recipient Age Gradient to the Prediction of Graft Outcome After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

被引:8
作者
Shin, M. [1 ]
Moon, H. H. [1 ]
Kim, J. M. [1 ]
Park, J. B. [1 ]
Kwon, C. H. D. [1 ]
Kim, S. -J. [1 ]
Joh, J. -W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
PATIENT SURVIVAL; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTORS; D-MELD; IMPACT; REGENERATION; MODEL; MORTALITY; OLDER; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.08.018
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Purpose. Advanced donor age is a well-known risk factor for poor graft function after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In addition, advanced recipient age has a significant impact because of the high prevalence of comorbidities. We investigated the relationship between donor recipient age gradient (DRAG) and the posttransplant outcomes in LDLT. Methods. We included 821 consecutive adult recipients who underwent LDLT from June 1997 to May 2011. According to the value of DRAG, they were divided into 2 groups: Negative years (the donor was younger than the recipient) and positive years (the donor was older than the recipient). These groups were further divided into subgroups (<=-21, -20 to -1, 0 to 20, and >= 21 years). We collected retrospectively patient characteristics, laboratory results, medical and surgical complications, and graft loss. Results. The positive DRAG group had higher level of posttransplant alkaline phosphatase, but a lower incidence of biliary complications. The negative DRAG group, particularly DRAG <= -21 years was associated with the superior 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year graft survivals. Recipients with DRAG >= 21 showed persistently inferior graft survival during the observation period. In cases of young donors, transplants utilizing lower DRAG seen between young donors and older recipients showed more favorable graft survival than that of young-to-young transplants. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that DRAG and a find donor age limit could be significant factors to predict graft survival after LDLT. Patients should carefully consider the worse graft survival if the donor is older than the recipient by >= 20.
引用
收藏
页码:3005 / 3012
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Allograft survival following adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation [J].
Abt, PL ;
Mange, KC ;
Olthoff, KM ;
Markmann, JF ;
Reddy, KR ;
Shaked, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (08) :1302-1307
[2]   Impact of live donor age (≥50) on liver transplantation [J].
Akamatsu, N. ;
Sugawara, Y. ;
Tamura, S. ;
Kaneko, J. ;
Matsui, Y. ;
Togashi, J. ;
Makuuchi, M. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (10) :3189-3193
[3]   Development of organ-specific donor risk indices [J].
Akkina, Sanjeev K. ;
Asrani, Sumeet K. ;
Peng, Yi ;
Stock, Peter ;
Kim, W. Ray ;
Israni, Ajay K. .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (04) :395-404
[4]   Analysis of Liver Transplant Outcomes for United Network for Organ Sharing Recipients 60 Years Old or Older Identifies Multiple Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Independent Prognostic Factors [J].
Aloia, Thomas A. ;
Knight, Richard ;
Gaber, A. Osama ;
Ghobrial, R. Mark ;
Goss, John A. .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (08) :950-959
[5]   Advanced Donor Age Alone Does Not Affect Patient or Graft Survival after Liver Transplantation [J].
Anderson, Christopher D. ;
Vachharajani, Neeta ;
Doyle, Majella ;
Lowell, Jeffrey A. ;
Wellen, Jason R. ;
Shenoy, Surendra ;
Lisker-Melman, Mauricio ;
Korenblat, Kevin ;
Crippin, Jeff ;
Chapman, William C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (06) :847-852
[6]   Balancing Donor and Recipient Risk Factors in Liver Transplantation: The Value of D-MELD With Particular Reference to HCV Recipients [J].
Avolio, A. W. ;
Cillo, U. ;
Salizzoni, M. ;
De Carlis, L. ;
Colledan, M. ;
Gerunda, G. E. ;
Mazzaferro, V. ;
Tisone, G. ;
Romagnoli, R. ;
Caccamo, L. ;
Rossi, M. ;
Vitale, A. ;
Cucchetti, A. ;
Lupo, L. ;
Gruttadauria, S. ;
Nicolotti, N. ;
Burra, P. ;
Gasbarrini, A. ;
Agnes, S. ;
Lirosi, M. C. ;
Miele, L. ;
Pompili, M. ;
Siciliano, M. ;
Perilli, V. ;
Gaspari, R. ;
Castagneto, M. ;
Tandoi, F. ;
Mangoni, I. ;
Belli, L. ;
Pinna, A. D. ;
Cescon, M. ;
Gridelli, B. ;
Li Petri, S. ;
Volpes, R. ;
Pinelli, D. ;
Fagiuoli, S. ;
Montalti, R. ;
Regalia, E. ;
Rossi, G. ;
Antonelli, B. ;
Berloco, P. ;
Lai, Q. ;
Risaliti, A. ;
Nicolini, D. ;
Valente, U. ;
Gelli, M. ;
Morelli, N. ;
Zamboni, F. ;
Tondolo, V. ;
Ettorre, G. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (12) :2724-2736
[7]   NO AGE LIMIT FOR LIVER TRANSPLANT DONORS [J].
Ballarin, Roberto ;
Spaggiari, Mario ;
Di Benedetto, Fabrizio ;
Montalti, Roberto ;
De Ruvo, Nicola ;
Cautero, Nicola ;
Losi, Luisa ;
Bagni, Alberto ;
D'Errico, Antonietta ;
Gerunda, Giorgio Enrico .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2010, 58 (09) :1816-1818
[8]   Utilization of Elderly Donors in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: When More is Less? [J].
Dayangac, Murat ;
Taner, C. Burcin ;
Yaprak, Onur ;
Demirbas, Tolga ;
Balci, Deniz ;
Duran, Cihan ;
Yuzer, Yildiray ;
Tokat, Yaman .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 17 (05) :548-555
[9]   Lack of Grafted Liver Rejuvenation in Adult-to-Pediatric Liver Transplantation [J].
Eguchi, Susumu ;
Takatsuki, Mitsuhisa ;
Hidaka, Masaaki ;
Soyama, Akihiko ;
Muraoka, Izumi ;
Tomonaga, Tetsuo ;
Shimokawa, Isao ;
Kanematsu, Takashi .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2011, 56 (05) :1542-1547
[10]   Joint Impact of Donor and Recipient Parameters on the Outcome of Liver Transplantation in Germany [J].
Fruehauf, Nils R. ;
Fischer-Froehlich, Carl-Ludwig ;
Kutschmann, Marcus ;
Schmidtmann, Irene ;
Kirste, Guenter .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 92 (12) :1378-1384