When and how social movements mobilize action within and across nations to promote solidarity with refugees

被引:47
作者
Thomas, Emma F. [1 ]
Smith, Laura G. E. [2 ]
McGarty, Craig [3 ]
Reese, Gerhard [4 ]
Kende, Anna [5 ]
Bliuc, Ana-Maria [3 ]
Curtin, Nicola [6 ]
Spears, Russell [7 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Psychol, Bath, Avon, England
[3] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Social Sci & Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Koblenz Landau, Fac Psychol, Koblenz, Germany
[5] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Dept Social & Educ Psychol, Budapest, Hungary
[6] Clark Univ, Dept Psychol, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[7] Univ Groningen, Dept Psychol, Groningen, Netherlands
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
social movements; social identity; emotion; ideology; solidarity; collective action; culture; COLLECTIVE ACTION; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; INTERGROUP EMOTIONS; IDENTITY FORMATION; ACTION TENDENCIES; MODEL; PERSONALITY; INGROUP; SELF; DOMINANCE;
D O I
10.1002/ejsp.2380
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When and how do social movements form to mobilize action across national boundaries? In the context of the 2015 movement to support Syrian refugees, we develop an integrative model of transnational social movement formation shaped by pre-existing world-views (social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism) and social media exposure to iconic events, resulting in an emergent group consciousness ("we are", "we believe", "we feel"). Group consciousness is, in turn, the proximal predictor of solidarity with refugees. Participants were from six countries: Hungary (N = 267), Romania (N = 163), Germany (N = 190), the United Kingdom (N = 159), the United States (N = 244) and Australia (N = 344). Multi-group structural equation models confirmed that group consciousness, shaped by individual differences and exposure to events through social media, was the proximal predictor of solidarity. The subjective meaning of group consciousness varied across samples, reflecting national differences. Results support the importance of considering individual and national differences, and group processes in understanding emergent social movements.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 229
页数:17
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, DOI 10.2307/2348581
[2]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INV CHILDR HER NOW
[4]   Differential Effects of Intergroup Contact for Authoritarians and Social Dominators: A Dual Process Model Perspective [J].
Asbrock, Frank ;
Christ, Oliver ;
Duckitt, John ;
Sibley, Chris G. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2012, 38 (04) :477-490
[5]   Opinion-based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action [J].
Bliuc, Ana-Maria ;
McGarty, Craig ;
Reynolds, Katherine ;
Muntele, Daniela .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 37 (01) :19-32
[6]  
Bliuc AM, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P226, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2507, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2507]
[7]   The issue of measurement invariance revisited [J].
Byrne, BM ;
Watkins, D .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 34 (02) :155-175
[8]   Predictors of Protest Among Anti-Globalization Demonstrators [J].
Cameron, James E. ;
Nickerson, Shannon L. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 39 (03) :734-761
[9]   A Three-Factor Model of Social Identity [J].
Cameron, James E. .
SELF AND IDENTITY, 2004, 3 (03) :239-262
[10]  
Castells M., 2015, Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781444319514