Development and validation of the Cannabis Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (CRSEQ) in adult cannabis users in treatment

被引:26
作者
Young, Ross McD. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gullo, Matthew J. [2 ]
Feeney, Gerald F. X. [1 ,2 ]
Connor, Jason P. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Alcohol & Drug Assessment Unit, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Fac Hlth, Ctr Youth Substance Abuse Res, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Inst Hlth & Biomed Innovat, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Discipline Psychiat, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Cannabis; Marijuana; Self-efficacy; Psychometric; Validation; ALCOHOL EXPECTANCIES; MARIJUANA DEPENDENCE; DIFFERENTIAL ROLE; FIT INDEXES; DRINKING; CUTOFF; MISUSE; ASSOCIATION; CONSUMPTION; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.018
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There are few valid clinical assessment instruments for cannabis. Self-efficacy, or the ability of users to resist temptation, is a central feature of social cognitive theory. This study outlines the development and validation of the Cannabis Refusal Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (CRSEQ), which measures the situational confidence to refuse cannabis. Method: One thousand two hundred and forty-six patients referred for cannabis assessment completed the CRSEQ including measures of cannabis consumption and dependence severity (Severity of Dependence Scale-Cannabis, SDS-C). The CRSEQ was subject to independent exploratory (n = 621, mean age 26.88, 78.6% male) and confirmatory (n = 625, mean age 27.51, 76.8% male) factor analysis. Results: Three factors: Emotional Relief, Opportunistic and Social Facilitation were identified. They provided a good statistical and conceptual fit for the data. Emotional Relief cannabis refusal self-efficacy was identified as most predictive of cannabis dependence, after controlling for cannabis consumption. Conclusions: The CRSEQ is recommended as a psychometrically sound and clinically useful measure for cannabis misuse treatment planning and assessment. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 251
页数:8
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]  
Annis H.M., 1988, SITUATIONAL CONFIDEN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, DRUG STAT SER
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1991, USERS GUIDE GEN HLTH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, TIMELINE FOLLOWBACK
[7]   TO DRINK OR NOT TO DRINK - THE DIFFERENTIAL ROLE OF ALCOHOL EXPECTANCIES AND DRINKING REFUSAL SELF-EFFICACY IN QUANTITY AND FREQUENCY OF ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION [J].
BALDWIN, AR ;
OEI, TPS ;
YOUNG, R .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1993, 17 (06) :511-530
[8]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[9]  
Bandura A., 1977, SOCIAL LEARNING THEO
[10]   On tests and indices for evaluating structural models [J].
Bentler, Peter M. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :825-829