A DNA vaccination regime including protein boost and electroporation protects cattle against foot-and-mouth disease

被引:29
作者
Fowler, V. [1 ]
Robinson, L. [1 ]
Bankowski, B. [1 ]
Cox, S. [1 ]
Parida, S. [1 ]
Lawlor, C. [2 ]
Gibson, D. [1 ]
O'Brien, F. [2 ]
Ellefsen, B. [3 ]
Hannaman, D. [3 ]
Takamatsu, H. -H. [1 ]
Barnett, P. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] AFRC, Inst Anim Hlth, Pirbright Lab, Ash Rd, Woking GU24 0NF, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Sch Pharm, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Ichor Med Syst Inc, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Foot-and-mouth disease; DNA vaccination; Cattle; Protection; IMMUNE-RESPONSES; VIRUS-INFECTION; REAL-TIME; SWINE; EFFICACY; VACCINES; FMDV; NEUTRALIZATION; POLYMERASE; CHALLENGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.02.002
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Protection against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) using DNA technology has been documented for sheep and pigs but not for the highly susceptible species of cattle. Twenty-five Holstein Friesian cross-bred cattle were vaccinated twice, 21 days apart, with a DNA vaccine containing the capsid coding region (P1) along with the non-structural proteins 2A, 3C and 3D (pcDNA3.1/P1-2A3C3D) of O-1 Kaufbeuren alone or coated onto PLG (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. In some pcDNA3.1/P1-2A3C3D was also combined with an adjuvant plasmid expressing bovine granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). DNA vaccinations were administered intramuscularly with, or without, the use of electroporation and at 42 days post primary vaccination cattle received a protein boost of 146S FMD virus (FMDV) antigen and non-structural protein 3D. For comparison, four cattle were vaccinated with a conventional FMD vaccine and two more included as unvaccinated controls. Apart from those immunised with PLC microparticles all cattle were challenged with 10(5) TCID50 cattle adapted O-1 Lausanne FMDV virus at day 93 post primary vaccination. All DNA vaccinated cattle regardless of regime developed good humoral and cell mediated responses prior to challenge. The best overall virus neutralising antibody, IFN-gamma and clinical protection (75%) were seen in the cattle whereby the DNA was delivered by electroporation. In contrast, only 25% of cattle vaccinated with the DNA vaccine without electroporation were clinically protected. The addition of GM-CSF in combination with electroporation further improved the efficacy of the vaccine, as demonstrated from the reduction of clinical disease and virus excretions in nasal swabs. We thus demonstrate for the first time that cattle can be clinically protected against FMDV challenge following a DNA prime-protein boost strategy, and particularly when DNA vaccine is combined with GM-CSF and delivered by electroporation. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 34
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease [J].
Alexandersen, S ;
Zhang, Z ;
Donaldson, AI ;
Garland, AJM .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGY, 2003, 129 (01) :1-36
[2]  
Babiuk L A, 2000, Dev Biol (Basel), V104, P73
[3]   Gene gun-mediate DNA vaccination against foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Benvenisti, L ;
Rogel, A ;
Kuznetzova, L ;
Bujanover, S ;
Becker, Y ;
Stram, Y .
VACCINE, 2001, 19 (28-29) :3885-3895
[4]   Development of a xenogeneic DNA vaccine program for canine malignant melanoma at the Animal Medical Center [J].
Bergman, PJ ;
Camps-Palau, MA ;
McKnight, JA ;
Leibman, NF ;
Craft, DM ;
Leung, C ;
Liao, J ;
Riviere, I ;
Sadelain, M ;
Hohenhaus, AE ;
Gregor, P ;
Houghton, AN ;
Perales, MA ;
Wolchok, JD .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 (21) :4582-4585
[5]   A DNA vaccine encoding foot-and-mouth disease virus B and T-cell epitopes targeted to class II swine leukocyte antigens protects pigs against viral challenge [J].
Borrego, Belen ;
Argilaguet, Jordi M. ;
Perez-Martin, Eva ;
Dominguez, Javier ;
Perez-Filgueira, Mariano ;
Escribano, Jose M. ;
Sobrino, Francisco ;
Rodriguez, Fernando .
ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH, 2011, 92 (02) :359-363
[6]   High potency vaccines induce protection against heterologous challenge with foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Brehm, K. E. ;
Kumar, N. ;
Thulke, H. -H. ;
Haas, B. .
VACCINE, 2008, 26 (13) :1681-1687
[7]   Comparative evaluation of six ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Brocchi, E. ;
Bergmann, I. E. ;
Dekker, A. ;
Paton, D. J. ;
Sammin, D. J. ;
Greiner, M. ;
Grazioli, S. ;
De Simone, F. ;
Yadin, H. ;
Haas, B. ;
Bulut, N. ;
Malirat, V. ;
Neitzert, E. ;
Goris, N. ;
Parida, S. ;
Sorensen, K. ;
De Clercq, K. .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 (47-48) :6966-6979
[8]   NEW APPROACHES TO VACCINATION AGAINST FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE [J].
BROWN, F .
VACCINE, 1992, 10 (14) :1022-1026
[9]  
Brown F, 1987, Prog Vet Microbiol Immunol, V3, P59
[10]   Induction of a protective response in swine vaccinated with DNA encoding foot-and-mouth disease virus empty capsid proteins and the 3D RNA polymerase [J].
Cedillo-Barrón, L ;
Foster-Cuevas, M ;
Belsham, GJ ;
Lefèvre, F ;
Parkhouse, RME .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 2001, 82 :1713-1724