Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women

被引:63
作者
Overgaard, Charlotte [1 ]
Moller, Anna Margrethe [2 ]
Fenger-Gron, Morten [3 ,4 ]
Knudsen, Lisbeth B. [1 ]
Sandall, Jane [5 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Sociol & Social Work, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, DK-8000 Aarhus N, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[5] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, Div Womens Hlth, St Thomas Hosp, London WC2R 2LS, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2011年 / 1卷 / 02期
关键词
BIRTH CENTER; CARE; PLACE; LABOR; EXPERIENCES; DELIVERY; MOTHERS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000262
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare perinatal and maternal morbidity and birth interventions in low-risk women giving birth in two freestanding midwifery units (FMUs) and two obstetric units (OUs). Design: A cohort study with a matched control group. Setting: The region of North Jutland, Denmark. Participants: 839 low-risk women intending FMU birth and a matched control group of 839 low-risk women intending OU birth were included at the start of care in labour. OU women were individually chosen to match selected obstetric/socio-economic characteristics of FMU women. Analysis was by intention to treat. Main outcome measures: Perinatal and maternal morbidity and interventions. Results: No significant differences in perinatal morbidity were observed between groups (Apgar scores <7/5, <9/5 or <7/1, admittance to neonatal unit, asphyxia or readmission). Adverse outcomes were rare and occurred in both groups. FMU women were significantly less likely to experience an abnormal fetal heart rate (RR: 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5), fetal-pelvic complications (0.2, 0.05 to 0.6), shoulder dystocia (0.3, 0.1 to 0.9), occipital-posterior presentation (0.5, 0.3 to 0.9) and postpartum haemorrhage >500 ml (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6) compared with OU women. Significant reductions were found for the FMU group's use of caesarean section (0.6, 0.3 to 0.9), instrumental delivery (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6), and oxytocin augmentation (0.5, 0.3 to 0.6) and epidural analgesia (0.4, 0.3 to 0.6). Transfer during or <2 h after birth occurred in 14.8% of all FMU births but more frequently in primiparas than in multiparas (36.7% vs 7.2%). Conclusion: Comparing FMU and OU groups, there was no increase in perinatal morbidity, but there were significantly reduced incidences of maternal morbidity, birth interventions including caesarean section, and increased likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth. FMU care may be considered as an adequate alternative to OU care for low-risk women. Pregnant prospective mothers should be given an informed choice of place of birth, including information on transfer.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Treatment patterns and outcomes in a low-risk nurse-midwifery practice [J].
Hastings-Tolsma, Marie ;
Vincent, Deborah ;
Park, Jeong-Hwan ;
Pan, Dongmei .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2009, 22 (01) :10-17
[12]   Whether induction of labor ahead in low-risk women improves pregnancy outcomes?: A retrospective cohort, observational study [J].
Ren, Huiyan ;
Zuo, Qing ;
Pan, Yi ;
Zhu, Xinxin ;
Yin, Tingting ;
Zhang, Min ;
Yin, Yin ;
Ge, Zhiping ;
Jiang, Ziyan ;
Lu, Hongmei .
MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (14) :E33426
[13]   Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study [J].
Jonsson, Maria ;
Cnattingius, Sven ;
Wikstrom, Anna-Karin .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (02) :198-203
[14]   Perinatal and maternal outcomes in planned home and obstetric unit births in women at 'higher risk' of complications: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study [J].
Li, Y. ;
Townend, J. ;
Rowe, R. ;
Brocklehurst, P. ;
Knight, M. ;
Linsell, L. ;
Macfarlane, A. ;
McCourt, C. ;
Newburn, M. ;
Marlow, N. ;
Pasupathy, D. ;
Redshaw, M. ;
Sandall, J. ;
Silverton, L. ;
Hollowell, J. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (05) :741-753
[15]   Obstetric Outcomes in Adolescents Related to Body Mass Index and Compared with Low-Risk Adult Women [J].
Isgren, Anna Ramo ;
Kjolhede, Preben ;
Blomberg, Marie .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (05) :426-434
[16]   Group versus traditional prenatal care in low-risk women delivering at term: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Carter, E. B. ;
Barbier, K. ;
Sarabia, R. ;
Macones, G. A. ;
Cahill, A. G. ;
Tuuli, M. G. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 37 (07) :769-771
[17]   The "Cocoon," first alongside midwifery-led unit within a Belgian hospital: Comparison of the maternal and neonatal outcomes with the standard obstetric unit over 2 years [J].
Welffens, Karine ;
Derisbourg, Sara ;
Costa, Elena ;
Englert, Yvon ;
Pintiaux, Axelle ;
Warnimont, Michele ;
Kirkpatrick, Christine ;
Buekens, Pierre ;
Daelemans, Caroline .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2020, 47 (01) :115-122
[18]   A prospective study of effects of psychological factors and sleep on obstetric interventions, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes among low-risk British Columbian women [J].
Hall, Wendy A. ;
Stoll, Kathrin ;
Hutton, Eileen K. ;
Brown, Helen .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2012, 12
[19]   Getting the first birth right: A retrospective study of outcomes for low-risk primiparous women receiving standard care versus midwifery model of care in the same tertiary hospital [J].
Wong, Nola ;
Browne, Jenny ;
Ferguson, Sally ;
Taylor, Jan ;
Davis, Deborah .
WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2015, 28 (04) :279-284
[20]   Fear of childbirth and emergency caesarean section in low-risk nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study [J].
Jespersen, Cecilie ;
Hegaard, Hanne Kristine ;
Schroll, Anne-Mette ;
Rosthoj, Susanne ;
Kjaergaard, Hanne .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 35 (04) :109-115