The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring

被引:137
作者
Holzner, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
Giesinger, Johannes M. [1 ]
Pinggera, Jakob [3 ]
Zugal, Stefan [3 ]
Schoepf, Felix [2 ,4 ]
Oberguggenberger, Anne S. [1 ]
Gamper, Eva M. [1 ]
Zabernigg, August [5 ]
Weber, Barbara [3 ]
Rumpold, Gerhard [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Evaluat Software Dev OG, A-6063 Rum, Austria
[3] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Comp Sci, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Oncotyrol Ctr Personalized Canc Med GmbH, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[5] Kufstein Cty Hosp, Dept Internal Med, A-6330 Kufstein, Austria
[6] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Med Psychol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ROUTINE CLINICAL-PRACTICE; ONCOLOGY PRACTICE; CANCER SURVIVORS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; DATA-COLLECTION; EPOCS SYSTEM; FEASIBILITY; PAPER;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6947-12-126
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient-reported Outcomes (PROs) capturing e.g., quality of life, fatigue, depression, medication side-effects or disease symptoms, have become important outcome parameters in medical research and daily clinical practice. Electronic PRO data capture (ePRO) with software packages to administer questionnaires, storing data, and presenting results has facilitated PRO assessment in hospital settings. Compared to conventional paper-pencil versions of PRO instruments, ePRO is more economical with regard to staff resources and time, and allows immediate presentation of results to the medical staff. The objective of our project was to develop software (CHES - Computer-based Health Evaluation System) for ePRO in hospital settings and at home with a special focus on the presentation of individual patient's results. Methods: Following the Extreme Programming development approach architecture was not fixed up-front, but was done in close, continuous collaboration with software end users (medical staff, researchers and patients) to meet their specific demands. Developed features include sophisticated, longitudinal charts linking patients' PRO data to clinical characteristics and to PRO scores from reference populations, a web-interface for questionnaire administration, and a tool for convenient creating and editing of questionnaires. Results: By 2012 CHES has been implemented at various institutions in Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and the UK and about 5000 patients participated in ePRO (with around 15000 assessments in total). Data entry is done by the patients themselves via tablet PCs with a study nurse or an intern approaching patients and supervising questionnaire completion. Discussion: During the last decade several software packages for ePRO have emerged for different purposes. Whereas commercial products are available primarily for ePRO in clinical trials, academic projects have focused on data collection and presentation in daily clinical practice and on extending cancer registries with PRO data. CHES includes several features facilitating the use of PRO data for individualized medical decision making. With its web-interface it allows ePRO also when patients are home. Thus, it provides complete monitoring of patients'physical and psychosocial symptom burden.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Aaronson NK, 2011, User's guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims
[3]   Integrating cancer survivors' experiences into UK cancer registries: design and development of the ePOCS system (electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors) [J].
Ashley, L. ;
Jones, H. ;
Thomas, J. ;
Forman, D. ;
Newsham, A. ;
Morris, E. ;
Johnson, O. ;
Velikova, G. ;
Wright, P. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 105 :S74-S81
[4]   Feasibility test of a UK-scalable electronic system for regular collection of patient-reported outcome measures and linkage with clinical cancer registry data: The electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system [J].
Ashley, Laura ;
Jones, Helen ;
Forman, David ;
Newsham, Alex ;
Brown, Julia ;
Downing, Amy ;
Velikova, Galina ;
Wright, Penny .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2011, 11
[5]   Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy [J].
Basch, E ;
Artz, D ;
Dulko, D ;
Scher, K ;
Sabbatini, P ;
Hensley, M ;
Mitra, N ;
Speakman, J ;
McCabe, M ;
Schrag, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (15) :3552-3561
[6]   Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy [J].
Basch, Ethan ;
Iasonos, Alexia ;
Barz, Allison ;
Culkin, Ann ;
Kris, Mark G. ;
Artz, David ;
Fearn, Paul ;
Speakman, John ;
Farquhar, Rena ;
Scher, Howard I. ;
McCabe, Mary ;
Schrag, Deborah .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (34) :5374-5380
[7]   The Missing Voice of Patients in Drug-Safety Reporting [J].
Basch, Ethan .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (10) :865-869
[8]  
Beck K., 2005, EXTREME PROGRAMMING
[9]   CLINICAL COMPUTING IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL [J].
BLEICH, HL ;
BECKLEY, RF ;
HOROWITZ, GL ;
JACKSON, JD ;
MOODY, ES ;
FRANKLIN, C ;
GOODMAN, SR ;
MCKAY, MW ;
POPE, RA ;
WALDEN, T ;
BLOOM, SM ;
SLACK, WV .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (12) :756-764
[10]   Physicians' knowledge of health-related quality of life and perception of its importance in daily clinical practice [J].
Bossola, Maurizio ;
Murri, Rita ;
Onder, Graziano ;
Turriziani, Adriana ;
Fantoni, Massimo ;
Padua, Luca .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2010, 8