Multicomponent geriatric intervention for elderly inpatients with delirium:: A randomized, controlled trial

被引:108
作者
Pitkälä, KH
Laurila, JV
Strandberg, TE
Tilvis, RS
机构
[1] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Clin Internal Med, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Clin Geriatr, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Helsinki City Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2006年 / 61卷 / 02期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
D O I
10.1093/gerona/61.2.176
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background. Delirium is a common syndrome with poor prognosis affecting elderly inpatients. Treatment is mainly based on common sense with wide variations in practice. We investigated whether intensified, multicomponent geriatric treatment could improve the prognosis of delirious patients. Methods. We performed a randomized, controlled trial of 174 patients with delirium in six general medicine units from an acute hospital in Helsinki, Finland. The intervention group received individually tailored geriatric treatment. The primary endpoint was the sum of those deceased individuals and the patients permanently institutionalized. Secondary endpoints included the number of days in hospitals and other institutions, delirium intensity, and cognition. Results. The mean age of patients was 83 years, and 3 1 % had previous dementia. The intervention group (N=87) received significantly more acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (58.6% vs 9.2%), atypical antipsychotics (69.8% vs 30.2%), specialist consultations (49.4% vs 28.7%), hip protectors (88.5% vs 3.4%), physiotherapy (87.4% vs 47.1%), and fewer conventional neuroleptics (8.0% vs 23.0%) than did the control group (N= 87). During the 1-year follow-up, 60.9% of the intervention group and 64.4% of controls were either deceased or permanently institutionalized (p =.638). The intervention group spent a mean of 126 days in institutions, and the control group 140 days (p =.688). Delirium was, however, alleviated more rapidly during hospitalization, and cognition improved significantly at 6 months in the intervention group. Conclusions. Faster alleviation of delirium and improved cognition justify good, comprehensive geriatric care for these patients although treatment produced no significant improvements in hard endpoints of prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 181
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AM PSYCHIATR ASSOC
[2]   Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bischoff-Ferrari, HA ;
Willett, WC ;
Wong, JB ;
Giovannucci, E ;
Dietrich, T ;
Dawson-Hughes, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (18) :2257-2264
[3]   The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale [J].
Breitbart, W ;
Rosenfeld, B ;
Roth, A ;
Smith, MJ ;
Cohen, K ;
Passik, S .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1997, 13 (03) :128-137
[4]   The delirium experience: Delirium recall and delirium-related distress in hospitalized patients with cancer, their spouses/caregivers, and their nurses [J].
Breitbart, W ;
Gibson, C ;
Tremblay, A .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2002, 43 (03) :183-194
[5]   Epidemiology of delirium [J].
Bucht, G ;
Gustafson, Y ;
Sandberg, O .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 1999, 10 (05) :315-318
[6]   Physicians vary in approaches to the clinical management of delirium [J].
Carnes, M ;
Howell, T ;
Rosenberg, M ;
Francis, J ;
Hildebrand, C ;
Knuppel, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2003, 51 (02) :234-239
[7]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[8]  
Cole MG, 2002, CAN MED ASSOC J, V167, P753
[9]  
COLE MG, 1994, CMAJ, V151, P956
[10]   Neural mechanisms of delirium: Current hypotheses and evolving concepts [J].
Flacker, JM ;
Lipsitz, LA .
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 54 (06) :B239-B246