Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0 among Iranian Cancer Patients

被引:4
作者
Norouzi, Hassan [1 ]
Roohi, Samaneh [2 ]
Shahhosseini, Meysam [3 ]
Ghasemabady, Robabeh Nouri [4 ]
机构
[1] Semnan Univ, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Clin Psychol, Mandishahr, Semnan, Iran
[2] Univ Zanjan, Fac Humanities, Dept Gen Psychol, Zanjan, Iran
[3] Semnan Univ, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Gen Psychol, Mandishahr, Semnan, Iran
[4] Kharazmi Univ, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Dept Clin Psychol, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Cancer; Disability; Psychometric; Scale; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL-CLASSIFICATION; EMOTION REGULATION; EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION; BREAST-CANCER; CO-RUMINATION; WHODAS II; VALIDATION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.30476/mejc.2019.81280.0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The WHODAS-2 is a disability assessment tool built according to the conceptual framework of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. This tool is a standard measure of disability dedicated to six specific domains. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale 2.0 among Iranian cancer patients. Method: This study included cancer patients who referred to the Cancer Institute of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran, Iran. For this purpose, we enrolled 320 patients and asked them to complete the questionnaires. Cronbach's a assessed the internal consistency. Pearson's correlation coefficient evaluated the divergent and convergent validity and correlation of WHODAS 2.0 with EORTC QLQ-C30, difficulty of emotion regulation, and co-rumination scales. Moreover, we assessed constructive validity by confirmatory factor analysis using smart PLS software. Result: The results showed that Cronbach's a was 0.91 for the questionnaire and higher than 0.75 for all domains. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation among the WHODAS 2.0 with Cancer EORTC QLQ-C30 (r = 0.85), DERS (r = 0.78), and co-rumination scales (r = 0.71). Conclusion: The version of the WHODAS 2.0 instrument had suitable psychometric properties in the sample of cancer patients. Therefore, it can be used in different populations and samples of cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 342
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   Constructing benefits from adversity: Adaptational significance and dispositional underpinnings [J].
Affleck, G ;
Tennen, H .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1996, 64 (04) :899-922
[3]  
Alimoradi H, 2015, ED SCI PSYCHOL STUDI, V3, P85
[4]   Relationship of depression, disability, and family caregiver attitudes to the quality of life of Kuwaiti persons with multiple sclerosis: a controlled study [J].
Alshubaili, Asmahan F. ;
Awadalla, Abdel W. ;
Ohaeri, Jude U. ;
Mabrouk, Asser A. .
BMC NEUROLOGY, 2007, 7 (1)
[5]   Health-related quality of life and its relationship to cognitive and emotional functioning in multiple sclerosis patients [J].
Benito-León, J ;
Morales, JM ;
Rivera-Navarro, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2002, 9 (05) :497-502
[6]   Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps [J].
Bickenbach, JE ;
Chatterji, S ;
Badley, EM ;
Üstün, TB .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (09) :1173-1187
[7]   Environmental effects on WHODAS 2.0 among patients with stroke with a focus on ICF category e120 [J].
Chang, Kwang-Hwa ;
Lin, Yen-Nung ;
Liao, Hua-Fang ;
Yen, Chia-Feng ;
Escorpizo, Reuben ;
Yen, Tze-Hsun ;
Liou, Tsan-Hon .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2014, 23 (06) :1823-1831
[8]  
Chisolm Theresa H, 2005, Trends Amplif, V9, P111, DOI 10.1177/108471380500900303
[9]   Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: Validity and reliability analyses [J].
Chiu, Tzu-Ying ;
Yen, Chia-Feng ;
Chou, Cheng-Hsiu ;
Lin, Jin-Ding ;
Hwang, Ai-Wen ;
Liao, Hua-Fang ;
Chi, Wen-Chou .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 35 (11) :2812-2820
[10]   Disability in depression and back pain - Evaluation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO DAS II) in a primary care setting [J].
Chwastiak, LA ;
Von Korff, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (06) :507-514