Attitudes towards own-checking and HACCP plans among Finnish food industry employees

被引:29
作者
Hielm, S
Tuominen, P
Aarnisalo, K
Raaska, L
Maijala, R
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Vet Med, Dept Food & Environm Hyg, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Natl Vet & Food Res Inst, Dept Risk Assessment, FIN-00581 Helsinki, Finland
[3] VTT Biotechnol, FIN-02044 Espoo, Finland
关键词
own-checking; HACCP; employee attitude survey;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2005.01.009
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Ten copies each of a mail survey was designed and distributed to 87 Finnish food manufacturing companies in order to be distributed to 870 employees representing both workers and managers. Respondents were asked about their attitudes towards food hygiene management strategies in their companies. The final response rates for companies and individual employees were 34.9% and 21.2%, respectively. Answers were stratified according to four job categories and four industry sectors (meat, dairy, fish and bakery). The employees' attitudes towards various surveyed risk management practices were exclusively positive, regardless of job category or industry sector. All 30 companies that responded to the survey had a functioning own-checking plan (OCP), while other quality management programs were less prevalent. When asked what had caused most difficulties in devising the OCP/ HACCP plan the most common answers were choosing the critical control points, committing the firm's entire workforce and organizing the documentation of monitoring results. According to the respondents, the biggest benefits of the OCP/HACCP plan were product safety and quality. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 407
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] HACCP and food hygiene in hospitals: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of food-services staff in Calabria, Italy
    Angelillo, IF
    Viggiani, NMA
    Greco, RM
    Rito, D
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (06) : 363 - 369
  • [2] Barriers of HACCP team members to guideline adherence
    Azanza, MPV
    Zamora-Luna, MBV
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2005, 16 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [3] Successful hazard analysis critical control point implementation in the United Kingdom: Understanding the barriers through the use of a behavioral adherence model
    Gilling, SJ
    Taylor, EA
    Kane, K
    Taylor, JZ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2001, 64 (05) : 710 - 715
  • [4] Readiness to implement Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) systems in Iowa schools
    Henroid, D
    Sneed, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DIETETIC ASSOCIATION, 2004, 104 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [5] Food safety regulation and the firm: understanding the compliance process
    Henson, S
    Heasman, M
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 1998, 23 (01) : 9 - 23
  • [6] Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) history and conceptual overview
    Hulebak, KL
    Schlosser, W
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2002, 22 (03) : 547 - 552
  • [7] Public perception of a range of potential food risks in the United Kingdom
    Kirk, SFL
    Greenwood, D
    Cade, JE
    Pearman, AD
    [J]. APPETITE, 2002, 38 (03) : 189 - 197
  • [8] Actual situation in the area of implementing quality assurance systems GMP, GHP and HACCP in Polish food production and processing plants
    Konecka-Matyjek, E
    Turlejska, H
    Pelmer, U
    Szponar, L
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2005, 16 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [9] How to make HACCP really work in practice
    Mortimore, S
    [J]. FOOD CONTROL, 2001, 12 (04) : 209 - 215
  • [10] Food hygiene and hazard analysis critical central point in the United Kingdom food industry: Practices, perceptions, and attitudes
    Mortlock, MP
    Peters, AC
    Griffith, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 1999, 62 (07) : 786 - 792