Watershed conservation and preservation: Environmental engagement as helping behavior

被引:43
作者
Story, Paul A. [2 ]
Forsyth, Donelson R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Richmond, Jepson Sch Leadership Studies, Richmond, VA 23173 USA
[2] Coll William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Watershed conservation; Environmental engagement; Behavioral intentions; Pollution;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.02.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
When will a community residents take action against urban sprawl that threatens the watershed where they live? Drawing on theoretical and empirical studies of helping behavior, we predicted that individuals will be most likely to respond to environmental challenges when they are aware of the environmental threat, believe the danger posed by the threat to be great, and feel responsible for addressing environmental problems. We tested this awareness-appraisal-responsibility (AAR) model by surveying watershed residents' awareness of watershed features, appraisal of watershed quality, sense of responsibility for protecting the watershed, and behavioral and contribution intentions. Structural equation modeling supported the model by confirming that resident's awareness and appraisal of their local watershed are related to their pro-environment behavioral and contribution intentions, but also their perception of responsibility for protecting the watershed. Mediational analyses confirmed that these relationships are likely sequentially ordered, with awareness leading to appraisal to responsibility and then behavioral and contribution intentions. The discussion considers the implications of these findings for interventions designed to increase environmental engagement. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 317
页数:13
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation [J].
Abrahamse, W ;
Steg, L ;
Vlek, C ;
Rothengatter, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 25 (03) :273-291
[2]  
Ajzen I., 1985, ACTION CONTROL, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
[3]   Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior - A test of Geller's actively caring hypothesis [J].
Allen, JB ;
Ferrand, JL .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1999, 31 (03) :338-353
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, LISREL 8 54
[5]  
ARCURY TA, 1990, ENVIRON BEHAV, V22, P23
[6]   RESPONDING TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS - WHAT FACTORS GUIDE INDIVIDUAL ACTION [J].
AXELROD, LJ ;
LEHMAN, DR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 13 (02) :149-159
[7]   THE PERSONAL THREAT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-PROBLEMS AS PREDICTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL PRACTICES [J].
BALDASSARE, M ;
KATZ, C .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1992, 24 (05) :602-616
[8]   Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis [J].
Bamberg, S ;
Schmidt, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 35 (02) :264-285
[9]   Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Moeser, Guido .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) :14-25
[10]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182