Prosigna® breast cancer assay: histopathologic correlation, development, and assessment of size, nodal status, Ki-67 (SiNK™) index for breast cancer prognosis

被引:17
作者
Baskota, Swikrity Upadhyay [1 ]
Dabbs, David J. [1 ,2 ]
Clark, Beth Z. [1 ]
Bhargava, Rohit [1 ]
机构
[1] UPMC, Magee Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] John A Burns Univ Hawaii, Ctr Canc, Honolulu, HI USA
关键词
MOLECULAR GRADE INDEX; DISTANT RECURRENCE; GENE-EXPRESSION; INTERNATIONAL KI67; ONCOTYPE DX; PAM50; RISK; ESTROGEN; PREDICTOR; SCORE; CHEMOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-020-0643-8
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The Prosigna (R) assay is a United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) cleared molecular test for prognostic use in hormone receptor-positive stage I/II breast cancer in postmenopausal women. We analyzed histopathologic features of 79 cases with Prosigna (R) assay results and found a significant correlation between tumor size, grade, and Ki-67 labeling index with Prosigna (R) score (0-40, 41-60, and 61-100) and Prosigna (R) risk categories. Since the Prosigna (R) risk stratification is influenced by lymph node status, we designed an index that included lymph node status and the two most correlated variables (size and Ki-67 labeling index). This was termed the size, nodal, and Ki-67 (SiNK (TM)) index and is calculated as follows: (size in mm) + (pN x 10) + (Ki-67 labeling index). The SiNK (TM) index was divided into <= 40 and >40 to test its prognostic significance in a well-characterized dataset of 106 ER+/HER2-negative stage I-II invasive breast cancers treated with standard multi-modality therapy with long term follow-up (average 101 months follow-up). Patients with SiNK (TM) <= 40 showed significantly improved distant recurrence-free survival (96% distant recurrence-free survival in SiNK (TM) <= 40 compared to 81% in SiNK (TM) >40; log-rank testpvalue: 0.0027). SiNK (TM) provides strong prognostic information in ERo+/HER2-negative breast cancers. SiNK (TM) index is simple to calculate using data from routine pathology reports. This should be further evaluated in larger datasets.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 76
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update [J].
Allison, Kimberly H. ;
Hammond, M. Elizabeth H. ;
Dowsett, Mitchell ;
McKernin, Shannon E. ;
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Fitzgibbons, Patrick L. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. ;
Lakhani, Sunil R. ;
Chavez-MacGregor, Mariana ;
Perlmutter, Jane ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Regan, Meredith M. ;
Rimm, David L. ;
Symmans, W. Fraser ;
Torlakovic, Emina E. ;
Varella, Leticia ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Weisberg, Tracey F. ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Wolff, Antonio C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (12) :1346-+
[2]   A Prospective Comparison of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score and the PAM50-Based Prosigna in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer [J].
Alvarado, Michael D. ;
Prasad, Che ;
Rothney, Megan ;
Cherbavaz, Diana B. ;
Sing, Amy P. ;
Baehner, Frederick L. ;
Svedman, Christer ;
Markopoulos, Christos J. .
ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2015, 32 (12) :1237-1247
[3]   Comparing Breast Cancer Multiparameter Tests in the OPTIMA Prelim Trial: No Test Is More Equal Than the Others [J].
Bartlett, John M. S. ;
Bayani, Jane ;
Marshall, Andrea ;
Dunn, Janet A. ;
Campbell, Amy ;
Cunningham, Carrie ;
Sobol, Monika S. ;
Hall, Peter S. ;
Poole, Christopher J. ;
Cameron, David A. ;
Earl, Helena M. ;
Rea, Daniel W. ;
Macpherson, Iain R. ;
Canney, Peter ;
Francis, Adele ;
McCabe, Christopher ;
Pinder, Sarah E. ;
Hughes-Davies, Luke ;
Makris, Andreas ;
Stein, Robert C. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (09)
[4]   The healthcare value of the Magee Decision Algorithm™: use of Magee Equations™ and mitosis score to safely forgo molecular testing in breast cancer [J].
Bhargava, Rohit ;
Clark, Beth Z. ;
Carter, Gloria J. ;
Brufsky, Adam M. ;
Dabbs, David J. .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (08) :1563-1570
[5]   Breast Cancers With Magee Equation Score of Less Than 18, or 18-25 and Mitosis Score of 1, Do Not Require Oncotype DX Testing: A Value Study [J].
Bhargava, Rohit ;
Clark, Beth Z. ;
Dabbs, David J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2019, 151 (03) :316-323
[6]  
Bhargava R, 2009, INT J CLIN EXP PATHO, V2, P444
[7]   Comparison of EndoPredict and EPclin With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Prediction of Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy [J].
Buus, Richard ;
Sestak, Ivana ;
Kronenwett, Ralf ;
Denkert, Carsten ;
Dubsky, Peter ;
Krappmann, Kristin ;
Scheer, Marsel ;
Petry, Christoph ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Dowsett, Mitch .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (11)
[8]   Comparison of PAM50 Risk of Recurrence Score With Oncotype DX and IHC4 for Predicting Risk of Distant Recurrence After Endocrine Therapy [J].
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Sestak, Ivana ;
Lopez-Knowles, Elena ;
Sidhu, Kalvinder ;
Dunbier, Anita K. ;
Cowens, J. Wayne ;
Ferree, Sean ;
Storhoff, James ;
Schaper, Carl ;
Cuzick, Jack .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (22) :2783-+
[9]   Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group [J].
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. ;
A'Hern, Roger ;
Bartlett, John ;
Coombes, R. Charles ;
Cuzick, Jack ;
Ellis, Matthew ;
Henry, N. Lynn ;
Hugh, Judith C. ;
Lively, Tracy ;
McShane, Lisa ;
Paik, Soon ;
Penault-Llorca, Frederique ;
Prudkin, Ljudmila ;
Regan, Meredith ;
Salter, Janine ;
Sotiriou, Christos ;
Smith, Ian E. ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Zujewski, Jo Anne ;
Hayes, Daniel F. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2011, 103 (22) :1656-1664
[10]   Concordance among gene-expression-based predictors for breast cancer [J].
Fan, Cheng ;
Oh, Daniel S. ;
Wessels, Lodewyk ;
Weigelt, Britta ;
Nuyten, Dimitry S. A. ;
Nobel, Andrew B. ;
van't Veer, Laura J. ;
Perou, Charles M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (06) :560-569