Changes in spinal but not cortical excitability following combined electrical stimulation of the tibial nerve and voluntary plantar-flexion

被引:34
作者
Lagerquist, Olle [2 ]
Mang, Cameron S. [3 ]
Collins, David F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Human Neurophysiol Lab, Fac Phys Educ & Recreat, Ctr Neurosci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H9, Canada
[2] No Alberta Inst Technol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Fac Med, Dept Phys Therapy, Brain Behav Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Motor cortex; H-reflex; Neuroplasticity; Human; Rehabilitation; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; COMMON PERONEAL NERVE; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; REFLEX EXCITABILITY; TETANIC STIMULATION; ANKLE DORSIFLEXION; NEURAL PLASTICITY; MUSCLE RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-012-3194-5
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Unilateral training involving voluntary contractions, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), or a combination of the two can increase the excitability of neural circuits bilaterally within the CNS. Many rehabilitation programs are designed to promote such "neuroplasticity" to improve voluntary movement following CNS damage. While much is known about this type of activity-dependent plasticity for the muscles that dorsi-flex the ankle, similar information is not available for the plantar-flexors. Presently, we assessed the excitability of corticospinal (CS) and spinal circuits for both soleus (SOL) muscles before and after voluntary contractions of the right plantar-flexors (VOL; 5 s on-5 s off, 40 min), NMES of the right tibial nerve (tnNMES; 5 s on-5 s off, 40 min), or both together (V + tnNMES). CS excitability for the right (rSOL) and left SOL (lSOL) muscles was assessed by quantifying motor evoked potentials elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Spinal excitability was assessed using measures from the ascending limb of the M-wave versus H-reflex recruitment curve. CS excitability did not change for rSOL (the activated muscle) or lSOL following any condition. In contrast, there was a marked increase in spinal excitability for rSOL, but only following V + tnNMES; the slope of the M-wave versus H-reflex recruitment curve increased approximately twofold (pre = 7.9; post = 16.2) and H-reflexes collected when the M-wave was similar to 5 % of the maximal M-wave (M-max) increased by similar to 1.5x (pre = 19 % M-max, post = 29 % M-max). Spinal excitability for lSOL did not change following any condition. Thus, only voluntary contractions that were coupled with NMES increased CNS excitability, and this occurred only in the ipsilateral spinal circuitry. These results are in marked contrast to previous studies showing NMES-induced changes in CS excitability for every other muscle studied and suggest that the mechanisms that regulate activity-dependent neuroplasticity are different for SOL than other muscles. Further, while rehabilitation strategies involving voluntary training and/or NMES of the plantar-flexors may be beneficial for producing movement and reducing atrophy, a single session of low-intensity NMES and voluntary training may not be effective for strengthening CS pathways to the SOL muscle.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 53
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]   Cortical reorganization following bimanual training and somatosensory stimulation in cervical spinal cord injury: A case report [J].
Hoffman, Larisa R. ;
Field-Fote, Edelle C. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2007, 87 (02) :208-223
[32]   Cross education and the human central nervous system [J].
Hortobagyi, T .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2005, 24 (01) :22-28
[33]   Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans [J].
Hortobágyi, T ;
Taylor, JL ;
Petersen, NT ;
Russell, G ;
Gandevia, SC .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 90 (04) :2451-2459
[34]  
Jusic A, 1995, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V35, P471
[35]   Functional Electrical Stimulation of Ankle Plantarflexor and Dorsiflexor Muscles Effects on Poststroke Gait [J].
Kesar, Trisha M. ;
Perumal, Ramu ;
Reisman, Darcy S. ;
Jancosko, Angela ;
Rudolph, Katherine S. ;
Higginson, Jill S. ;
Binder-Macleod, Stuart A. .
STROKE, 2009, 40 (12) :3821-3827
[36]   Motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve depends on the voluntary drive [J].
Khaslavskaia, S ;
Sinkjaer, T .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2005, 162 (04) :497-502
[37]   Increase in tibialis anterior motor cortex excitability following repetitive electrical stimulation of the common peroneal nerve [J].
Khaslavskaia, S ;
Ladouceur, M ;
Sinkjaer, T .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 145 (03) :309-315
[38]  
Kitago T, 2004, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, V115, P858, DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.11.029
[39]   Neural plasticity and neurorehabilitation: Teaching the new brain old tricks [J].
Kleim, Jeffrey A. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2011, 44 (05) :521-528
[40]   Electrical stimulation of the human common peroneal nerve elicits lasting facilitation of cortical motor-evoked potentials [J].
Knash, ME ;
Kido, A ;
Gorassini, M ;
Chan, KM ;
Stein, RB .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 153 (03) :366-377