Implementation of guidelines for metabolic syndrome control in kidney transplant recipients: results at a single center

被引:2
|
作者
Houri, Inbal
Tzukert, Keren
Levi, Irit Mor-Yosef
Aharon, Michal
Bloch, Aharon
Gotsman, Olga
Backenroth, Rebecca
Levi, Ronen
Ben Dov, Iddo
Rubinger, Dvora
Elhalel, Michal Dranitzki [1 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ Med Ctr, Serv Nephrol, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
来源
DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME | 2015年 / 7卷
关键词
Metabolic syndrome; Kidney transplantation; Treatment practice; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTOR; ATHEROSCLEROTIC EVENTS; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; DIABETES-MELLITUS; CARDIAC OUTCOMES; BLOOD-PRESSURE; GRAFT FUNCTION; UNITED-STATES; DISEASE; HYPERTENSION;
D O I
10.1186/s13098-015-0083-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death among kidney transplant recipients. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk for cardiovascular events and decreases graft survival. Lately, guidelines for management of the metabolic syndrome, primarily hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypercholesterolemia have dramatically changed in an attempt to decrease cardiovascular risks among kidney transplant recipients. In the present study we examined whether these guideline changes had impact on our management of post-transplantation patients and the subsequent treatment outcomes for these diseases. Methods: Data were obtained from kidney transplant clinic files from two follow-up (FU) periods-between 1994-1997 and between 2008-2011. Demographic data, monitoring and screening frequency for cardiovascular risk factors, immunosuppression regimen, treatment for hypertension, diabetes and hyperlipidemia, treatment outcomes and graft function changes were compared between the two follow-up periods. Results: There was a significant increase in the percentage of patients undergoing transplantation due to renal failure secondary to diabetes and/or hypertension. Patient monitoring and screening during the second FU period were less frequent, but more targeted, reflecting changes in clinic routines. Blood pressure was better controlled in the second FU period (p < 0.01), as was hypercholesterolemia (p < 0.001). High fasting glucose levels were more prevalent among patients in the second group (p < 0.005), although more patients received treatment for DM (p < 0.001). Significantly, fewer patients experienced deterioration of kidney functions during the second FU period (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found that guideline changes had impact on clinical practice, which translated to better control of the metabolic syndrome. DM control is challenging. Overall, stability of kidney function improved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Nutritional Management of Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Fry, Karen
    Patwardhan, Aditi
    Ryan, Catherine
    Trevillian, Paul
    Chadban, Steven
    Westgarth, Fidye
    Chan, Maria
    JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION, 2009, 19 (01) : 101 - 104
  • [32] Favipiravir Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19: A Single-Center Experience
    Kaya, Burcu
    Atas, Dilek Barutcu
    Tigen, Elif Tukenmez
    Asicioglu, Ebru
    Arikan, Hakki
    Tuglular, Serhan
    Velioglu, Arzu
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 20 (02) : 143 - 149
  • [33] Oral semaglutide in kidney transplant recipients with metabolic syndrome: three Japanese cases
    Ryoichi Miyazaki
    Kyoko Miyagi
    Renal Replacement Therapy, 9
  • [34] Metabolic syndrome and new onset diabetes after transplantation in kidney transplant recipients
    Luan, Fu L.
    Langewisch, Eric
    Ojo, Akinlolu
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (06) : 778 - 783
  • [35] Prevalence and risk factors of polyomavirus BK replication in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients from a single transplant center
    Mindlova, Martina
    Boucek, Petr
    Saudek, Frantisek
    Skibova, Jelena
    Jedinakova, Teodora
    Lipar, Kvetoslav
    Adamec, Milos
    Hirsch, Hans H.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 26 (02) : 267 - 274
  • [36] Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: Single-Center Experience in the Middle East
    Gheith, Osama
    Halim, Medhat A.
    Al-Otaibi, Torki
    El-sayed, Ayman
    Nair, Prasad
    Mahmoud, Tarek
    Fathy, Ahmed
    Hameed, Mohamed Abdul
    Samy, Ahmed
    El Serwy, Nabil
    Nagib, Ayman M.
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 17 : 135 - 141
  • [37] A Single-Center Report of Hypertension in Native American Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Rios, Ian P.
    Elsaidi, Ahmed
    Akin, Danielle E.
    Nowland, Ashlyn M.
    Budhiraja, Pooja
    Hommos, Musab S.
    Heilman, Raymond L.
    Abu Jawdeh, Bassam G.
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2025,
  • [38] The benefits of cancer screening in kidney transplant recipients: a single-center experience
    Kato, Taigo
    Kakuta, Yoichi
    Abe, Toyofumi
    Yamanaka, Kazuaki
    Imamura, Ryoichi
    Okumi, Masayoshi
    Ichimaru, Naotsugu
    Takahara, Shiro
    Nonomura, Norio
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (02): : 153 - 158
  • [39] Comparison of preemptive kidney transplant recipients with nonpreemptive kidney recipients in single center: 5 years of follow-up
    Sayin, Burak
    Colak, Turan
    Tutal, Emre
    Sezer, Siren
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY AND RENOVASCULAR DISEASE, 2013, 6 : 95 - 99
  • [40] Center variation in screening for and management of metabolic syndrome in pediatric liver transplant recipients: A survey of SPLIT centers
    Hilk, Kelly
    Zerofsky, Melissa
    Rhee, Sue
    Rosenthal, Philip
    Perito, Emily R.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 23 (03)