An Examination of Factors Influencing Responses to Requests for Disability Accommodations

被引:21
作者
Carpenter, Nichelle C. [1 ,2 ]
Paetzold, Ramona L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Sch Labor & Employment Relat, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Psychol, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, Dept Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
disability; employment; reasonable accommodation; discrimination; fairness; WORKPLACE ACCOMMODATIONS; EMPLOYEES; EMPATHY; INDIVIDUALS; WILLINGNESS; ATTITUDES; COWORKERS; RATINGS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1037/a0030853
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the influences of responses to reasonable accommodation requests for an individual with a disability. Research. Method/Design: Two-hundred-forty individuals participated in a vignette-based experiment in which aspects of the requestor's disability and the accommodation request were manipulated. Results: The results showed that intentions to grant an accommodation were predicted by a number of factors, including emotional responses toward the requestor, characteristics of the impairment causing the disability, characteristics of the accommodation, and perceptions of fairness. Conclusions/Implications: The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act (ADAAA) mandates organizations to provide reasonable accommodations to qualified employees with impairments that are disabling, yet discrimination in the form of the unfair rejections of these requests still persists. Altogether, this study provides evidence that decisions regarding reasonable accommodations requests are likely influenced by a number of factors, none of which constitute legal reasons for denying a request.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 27
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SOCIAL MOTIVATION JU
[3]   Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request an accommodation: Can requesters' beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? [J].
Baldridge, DC ;
Veiga, JF .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2001, 26 (01) :85-99
[4]   Predictors of workplace accommodations for employees with mobility-related disabilities [J].
Balser, Deborah B. .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2007, 39 (05) :656-683
[5]   DISTRESS AND EMPATHY - 2 QUALITATIVELY DISTINCT VICARIOUS EMOTIONS WITH DIFFERENT MOTIVATIONAL CONSEQUENCES [J].
BATSON, CD ;
FULTZ, J ;
SCHOENRADE, PA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1987, 55 (01) :19-39
[6]   NEGATIVE-STATE RELIEF AND THE EMPATHY ALTRUISM HYPOTHESIS [J].
BATSON, CD ;
BATSON, JG ;
GRIFFITT, CA ;
BARRIENTOS, S ;
BRANDT, JR ;
SPRENGELMEYER, P ;
BAYLY, MJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 56 (06) :922-933
[7]   EMPATHY-BASED HELPING - IS IT SELFLESSLY OR SELFISHLY MOTIVATED [J].
CIALDINI, RB ;
SCHALLER, M ;
HOULIHAN, D ;
ARPS, K ;
FULTZ, J ;
BEAMAN, AL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 52 (04) :749-758
[8]   Accommodation in the workplace [J].
Cleveland, JN ;
BarnesFarrell, JL ;
Ratz, JM .
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 7 (01) :77-107
[9]   Factors affecting coworkers' procedural justice inferences of the workplace accommodations of employees with disabilities [J].
Colella, A ;
Paetzold, RL ;
Belliveau, MA .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 57 (01) :1-23
[10]  
Colella A, 2005, ORGANIZATIONAL FRONT, P227