Municipal Solid Waste as a Source of Electric Power Generation in Colombia: A Techno-Economic Evaluation under Different Scenarios

被引:43
作者
Alzate, Santiago [1 ]
Restrepo-Cuestas, Bonie [2 ]
Jaramillo-Duque, Alvaro [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Pascual Bravo, Dept Elect Engn, Fac Engn, Medellin 050034, Colombia
[2] Inst Tecnol Metropolitano, Res Grp Adv Mat & Energy MATyER, Medellin 050013, Colombia
[3] Univ Antioquia, Dept Elect Engn, Fac Engn, Res Grp Efficient Energy Management GIMEL, Medellin 050010, Colombia
来源
RESOURCES-BASEL | 2019年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
waste to energy; municipal solid waste; energy policies; techno-economic evaluation; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; TO-ENERGY STATUS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; LANDFILL GAS; INCINERATION PLANT; FEASIBILITY; MANAGEMENT; RECOVERY; BIOGAS; MSW;
D O I
10.3390/resources8010051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This work evaluates the techno-economic prefeasibility of waste to energy projects in Colombia using four different conversion technologies of incineration, gasification, anaerobic digestion and landfill gas. Three study cases were selected to represent typical urban centers in Colombia, which were namely Guayata, Andes and Pasto. After feasible technologies were identified for each case, their energy recovery potential was calculated based on the mathematical models and publicly available information about the composition of the wastes produced in these three municipalities. A subsequent economic analysis was conducted by applying the incentives established in Law 1715 for projects involving non-conventional renewable energy sources. The cash flows produced by each technology in the three scenarios were evaluated to obtain the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), which was found to be influenced by the benefits of this legislation. However, the economic benefits were not significant in the small municipality of Guayata. In turn, in Andes, a high electricity price (100 USD/MWh) would entail a positive IRR of 2.6%. In Pasto, which is the biggest city of the three, the maximum IRR of landfill gas and anaerobic digestion reached 13.59% and 14.27%, respectively. The results show that these types of projects can have positive economic results if tax and government incentives are taken into account.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Incineration of municipal solid waste in Malaysia: Salient issues, policies and waste-to-energy initiatives [J].
Abd Kadir, Sharifah Aishah Syed ;
Yin, Chun-Yang ;
Sulaiman, Muhamad Rosli ;
Chen, Xi ;
El-Harbawi, Mohanad .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 :181-186
[2]   Feasibility study of a municipality solid waste incineration plant in Jordan [J].
Abu-Hijleh, BAK ;
Mousa, M ;
Al-Dwairi, R ;
Al-Kumoos, M ;
Al-Tarazi, S .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1998, 39 (11) :1155-1159
[3]  
Agencia EFE, 2018, OL DEST SOL INC EN R
[4]   Analysis of the feasibility of the recovery of landfill gas: a case study of Mexico [J].
Aguilar-Virgen, Quetzalli ;
Taboada-Gonzalez, Paul ;
Ojeda-Benitez, Sara .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 79 :53-60
[5]   Modeling and comparative assessment of municipal solid waste gasification for energy production [J].
Arafat, Hassan A. ;
Jijakli, Kenan .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (08) :1704-1713
[6]  
Arroyave Tobon I.C., 2005, PLAN GESTION RESIDUO, P43
[7]   Incineration of municipal and assimilated wastes in France: Assessment of latest energy and material recovery performances [J].
Autret, Erwan ;
Berthier, Francine ;
Luszezanec, Audrey ;
Nicolas, Florence .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 139 (03) :569-574
[8]   Waste-to-energy status in Serbia [J].
Bajic, Bojana Z. ;
Dodic, Sinisa N. ;
Vucurovic, Damjan G. ;
Dodic, Jelena M. ;
Grahovac, Jovana A. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 :1437-1444
[9]   The electric energy potential of landfill biogas in Brazil [J].
Barros, Regina Mambeli ;
Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lucio ;
da Silva, Tiago Rodrigo .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 65 :150-164
[10]   Energy production from waste: Evaluation of anaerobic digestion and bioelectrochemical systems based on energy efficiency and economic factors [J].
Beegle, Jeffrey R. ;
Borole, Abhijeet P. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 96 :343-351