Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Short and Long-Term Results

被引:8
|
作者
Di Carlo, Sara [1 ]
Siragusa, Leandro [1 ]
Fassari, Alessia [2 ]
Fiori, Enrico [2 ]
La Rovere, Francesca [2 ]
Izzo, Paolo [2 ]
Usai, Valeria [1 ]
Cavallaro, Giuseppe [2 ]
Franceschilli, Marzia [1 ]
Dhimolea, Sirvjo [1 ]
Sibio, Simone [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Surg Sci, Viale Oxford 81, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[2] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Surg Pietro Valdoni, Umberto I Univ Hosp, Viale Policlin 155, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
gastric cancer; laparoscopic gastrectomy; open gastrectomy; D2; lymphadenectomy; OPEN DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ASSISTED GASTRECTOMY; RADICAL GASTRECTOMY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; CROHNS-DISEASE; FEASIBILITY; MULTICENTER; DISSECTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol29110665
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer is widely accepted and routinely performed. However, it is still debated whether the laparoscopic approach is a valid alternative to open gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study is to compare short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic (LG) and open (OG) total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with AGC. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients who underwent LG and OG for ACG between January 2015 and December 2021. Primary endpoints were the following: recurrence rate, 3-year disease-free survival, 3-year and 5-year overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to compare variables influencing outcomes and survival. Results: Ninety-two patients included: fifty-three OG and thirty-nine LG. No difference in morbidity and mortality. LG was associated with lower recurrence rates (OG 22.6% versus LG 12.8%, p = 0.048). No differences in 3-year and 5-year overall survival; 3-year disease-free survival was improved in the LG group on the univariate analysis but not after the multivariate one. LG was associated with longer operative time, lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Lymph node yield was higher in LG. Conclusion: LG for AGC seems to provide satisfactory clinical and oncological outcomes in medium volume centers, improved postoperative results and possibly lower recurrence rates.
引用
收藏
页码:8442 / 8455
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer
    Zhang, Ying
    Qi, Fengxiang
    Jiang, Yong
    Zhai, Haoyu
    Ji, Yinglan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (08): : 13564 - 13570
  • [42] Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in overweight patients
    Kazuaki Matsui
    Shinichi Sakuramoto
    Hirofumi Sugita
    Keiji Nishibeppu
    Gen Ebara
    Shohei Fujita
    Shiro Fujihata
    Shuichiro Oya
    Yutaka Miyawaki
    Hiroshi Sato
    Keishi Yamashita
    Surgery Today, 2022, 52 : 1218 - 1228
  • [43] Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer
    Yasuhiko Mohri
    Hiromi Yasuda
    Masaki Ohi
    Koji Tanaka
    Susumu Saigusa
    Masato Okigami
    Tadanobu Shimura
    Minako Kobayashi
    Masato Kusunoki
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 1627 - 1635
  • [44] Long-term and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced gastric cancer: An updated meta-analysis
    Zhang, Wei
    Huang, Zhangkan
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Che, Xu
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2021, 17 (04) : 423 - 434
  • [45] Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in high-risk patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis
    Xu, Bin-bin
    Lu, Jun
    Zheng, Zhi-fang
    Huang, Chang-ming
    Zheng, Chao-hui
    Xie, Jian-wei
    Wang, Jia-bin
    Lin, Jian-xian
    Chen, Qi-yue
    Cao, Long-long
    Lin, Mi
    Tu, Ru-hong
    Huang, Ze-ning
    Li, Ping
    Lin, Ju-li
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (01): : 58 - 70
  • [46] Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: The LOC-1 Study
    Honda, Michitaka
    Hiki, Naoki
    Kinoshita, Takahiro
    Yabusaki, Hiroshi
    Abe, Takayuki
    Nunobe, Souya
    Terada, Mitsumi
    Matsuki, Atsushi
    Sunagawa, Hideki
    Aizawa, Masaki
    Healy, Mark A.
    Iwasaki, Manabu
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (02) : 214 - 222
  • [47] A matched cohort study of the failure pattern after laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: does the operative approach matter?
    Lu, Jun
    Wu, Dong
    Xu, Bin-Bin
    Xue, Zhen
    Zheng, Hua-Long
    Xie, Jian-Wei
    Wang, Jia-Bin
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Li, Ping
    Zheng, Chao-Hui
    Huang, Chang-Ming
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (01): : 689 - 700
  • [48] Short- and Long-Term Advantages of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Cancer
    Puccetti, Francesco
    Cinelli, Lorenzo
    Turi, Stefano
    Socci, Davide
    Rosati, Riccardo
    Elmore, Ugo
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [49] Comparison of Short-term and Long-term Clinical Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer
    Shida, Atsuo
    Mitsumori, Norio
    Fujioka, Shuichi
    Takano, Yuta
    Iwasaki, Taizou
    Takahashi, Naoto
    Ishibashi, Yoshio
    Omura, Nobuo
    Yanaga, Katsuhiko
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2016, 26 (04): : 319 - 323
  • [50] Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Gastric Cancer in Western Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes
    Garbarino, Giovanni Maria
    Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo
    Lucarini, Alessio
    Piccolino, Gianmarco
    Mercantini, Paolo
    Costa, Alessandro
    Tonini, Giuseppe
    Canali, Giulia
    Muttillo, Edoardo Maria
    Costa, Gianluca
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (13)