Applications of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors (SBAF) for Cross-Calibration

被引:150
|
作者
Chander, Gyanesh [1 ]
Mishra, Nischal [2 ]
Helder, Dennis L. [2 ]
Aaron, David B. [2 ]
Angal, Amit [3 ]
Choi, Taeyoung [4 ,5 ]
Xiong, Xiaoxiong [6 ]
Doelling, David R. [7 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Stinger Ghaffarian Technol, Earth Resources Observat & Sci EROS Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[4] Sigma Space Corp, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[5] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[6] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[7] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2013年 / 51卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Environmental Satellite (Envisat) Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY); Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Hyperion; Landsat 7 (L7) Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM plus ); radiometric cross-calibration; relative spectral response (RSR); spectral band adjustment factors (SBAFs); Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); LANDSAT-7 ETM+; SCIAMACHY; PERFORMANCE; SAHARAN; SENSORS; SITES; TM;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228007
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
To monitor land surface processes over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales, it is critical to have coordinated observations of the Earth's surface acquired from multiple space-borne imaging sensors. However, an integrated global observation framework requires an understanding of how land surface processes are seen differently by various sensors. This is particularly true for sensors acquiring data in spectral bands whose relative spectral responses (RSRs) are not similar and thus may produce different results while observing the same target. The intrinsic offsets between two sensors caused by RSR mismatches can be compensated by using a spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF), which takes into account the spectral profile of the target and the RSR of the two sensors. The motivation of this work comes from the need to compensate the spectral response differences of multispectral sensors in order to provide a more accurate cross-calibration between the sensors. In this paper, radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and the Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors was performed using near-simultaneous observations over the Libya 4 pseudoinvariant calibration site in the visible and near-infrared spectral range. The RSR differences of the analogous ETM+ and MODIS spectral bands provide the opportunity to explore, understand, quantify, and compensate for the measurement differences between these two sensors. The cross-calibration was initially performed by comparing the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectances between the two sensors over their lifetimes. The average percent differences in the long-term trends ranged from -5% to + 6%. The RSR compensated ETM+ TOA reflectance (ETM+*) measurements were then found to agree with MODIS TOA reflectance to within 5% for all bands when Earth Observing-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data were used to produce the SBAFs. These differences were later reduced to within 1% for all bands (except band 2) by using Environmental Satellite Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography hyperspectral data to produce the SBAFs.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1281
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multitemporal Cross-Calibration of the Terra MODIS and Landsat 7 ETM+ Reflective Solar Bands
    Angal, Amit
    Xiong, Xiaoxiong
    Wu, Aisheng
    Chander, Gyanesh
    Choi, Taeyoung
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (04): : 1870 - 1882
  • [32] Cross-Calibration of Landsat-7's Visible-Near-Infrared Bands with Terra-MODIS over Dark Waters
    Pahlevan, Nima
    Raqueno, Nina G.
    Schott, John R.
    OCEAN SENSING AND MONITORING IV, 2012, 8372
  • [33] Cross-Calibration of HY-1D/COCTS Thermal Emissive Bands in the South China Sea
    Chen, Rui
    Guan, Lei
    Liu, Mingkun
    Qu, Liqin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [34] Radiometric Variations of On-Orbit FORMOSAT-5 RSI from Vicarious and Cross-Calibration Measurements
    Lin, Tang-Huang
    Chang, Jui-Chung
    Hsu, Kuo-Hsien
    Lee, Yun-Shan
    Zeng, Sheng-Kai
    Liu, Gin-Rong
    Tsai, Fu-An
    Chan, Hai-Po
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (22)
  • [35] On-board In-flight Energy Scale Cross-calibration Effects of Solar X-ray Instruments
    Vaananen, Mikko
    SHOCK WAVES IN SPACE AND ASTROPHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 1183 : 113 - 120
  • [36] Cross-calibration of MODIS with ETM plus and ALI sensors for long-term monitoring of land surface processes
    Meyer, David
    Chander, Gyanesh
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XI, 2006, 6296
  • [37] Radiometric Cross-Calibration of Large-View-Angle Satellite Sensors Using Global Searching to Reduce BRDF Influence
    Zhou, Qu
    Tian, Liqiao
    Li, Jian
    Wu, Hua
    Zeng, Qun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 59 (06): : 5234 - 5245
  • [38] Radiometric cross-calibration of Gaofen-1 WFV cameras using Landsat-8 OLI images: A solution for large view angle associated problems
    Feng, Lian
    Li, Juan
    Gong, Weishu
    Zhao, Xi
    Chen, Xiaoling
    Pang, Xiaoping
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 174 : 56 - 68
  • [39] An Investigation of a Novel Cross-Calibration Method of FY-3C/VIRR against NPP/VIIRS in the Dunhuang Test Site
    Gao, Caixia
    Zhao, Yongguang
    Li, Chuanrong
    Ma, Lingling
    Wang, Ning
    Qian, Yonggang
    Ren, Lu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (01)
  • [40] Radiometric Cross-Calibration of the ZY1-02D Hyperspectral Imager Using the GF-5 AHSI Imager
    Niu, Chao
    Tan, Kun
    Wang, Xue
    Han, Bo
    Ge, Shule
    Du, Peijun
    Wang, Feng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60