Applications of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors (SBAF) for Cross-Calibration

被引:150
|
作者
Chander, Gyanesh [1 ]
Mishra, Nischal [2 ]
Helder, Dennis L. [2 ]
Aaron, David B. [2 ]
Angal, Amit [3 ]
Choi, Taeyoung [4 ,5 ]
Xiong, Xiaoxiong [6 ]
Doelling, David R. [7 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Stinger Ghaffarian Technol, Earth Resources Observat & Sci EROS Ctr, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
[2] S Dakota State Univ, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[3] Sci Syst & Applicat Inc, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[4] Sigma Space Corp, Lanham, MD 20706 USA
[5] George Mason Univ, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[6] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[7] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2013年 / 51卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
Environmental Satellite (Envisat) Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY); Earth Observing-1 (EO-1) Hyperion; Landsat 7 (L7) Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM plus ); radiometric cross-calibration; relative spectral response (RSR); spectral band adjustment factors (SBAFs); Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); LANDSAT-7 ETM+; SCIAMACHY; PERFORMANCE; SAHARAN; SENSORS; SITES; TM;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228007
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
To monitor land surface processes over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales, it is critical to have coordinated observations of the Earth's surface acquired from multiple space-borne imaging sensors. However, an integrated global observation framework requires an understanding of how land surface processes are seen differently by various sensors. This is particularly true for sensors acquiring data in spectral bands whose relative spectral responses (RSRs) are not similar and thus may produce different results while observing the same target. The intrinsic offsets between two sensors caused by RSR mismatches can be compensated by using a spectral band adjustment factor (SBAF), which takes into account the spectral profile of the target and the RSR of the two sensors. The motivation of this work comes from the need to compensate the spectral response differences of multispectral sensors in order to provide a more accurate cross-calibration between the sensors. In this paper, radiometric cross-calibration of the Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) and the Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors was performed using near-simultaneous observations over the Libya 4 pseudoinvariant calibration site in the visible and near-infrared spectral range. The RSR differences of the analogous ETM+ and MODIS spectral bands provide the opportunity to explore, understand, quantify, and compensate for the measurement differences between these two sensors. The cross-calibration was initially performed by comparing the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectances between the two sensors over their lifetimes. The average percent differences in the long-term trends ranged from -5% to + 6%. The RSR compensated ETM+ TOA reflectance (ETM+*) measurements were then found to agree with MODIS TOA reflectance to within 5% for all bands when Earth Observing-1 Hyperion hyperspectral data were used to produce the SBAFs. These differences were later reduced to within 1% for all bands (except band 2) by using Environmental Satellite Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography hyperspectral data to produce the SBAFs.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1281
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Spectral Band Adjustment Factors for Cross-Calibration of Visible Imagers
    Doelling, David R.
    Haney, Conor O.
    Bhatt, Rajendra
    Scarino, Benjamin R.
    Gopalan, Arun
    Khakurel, Prathana
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XXVII, 2022, 12232
  • [2] Radiometric Cross-Calibration of Hyperspectral Microsatellites Using Spectral Homogeneity Factor
    Zhang, Siqing
    Rao, Keyi
    Wu, Zhaocong
    Wang, Shaoju
    Dai, Zhixiong
    Fang, Ruixin
    Wang, Kexin
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 18 : 2342 - 2354
  • [3] Global cross-calibration of Landsat spectral mixture models
    Sousa, Daniel
    Small, Christopher
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 192 : 139 - 149
  • [4] Assessment of Spectral, Misregistration, and Spatial Uncertainties Inherent in the Cross-Calibration Study
    Chander, Gyanesh
    Helder, Dennis L.
    Aaron, David
    Mishra, Nischal
    Shrestha, Alok K.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (03): : 1282 - 1296
  • [5] Impact of a Hyperspectral Satellite Cross-Calibration Radiometer's Spatial and Noise Characteristics on Cross-Calibration
    Ryan, Robert E.
    Pagnutti, Mary
    Huggins, Max
    Burch, Kara
    Sitton, David
    Manriquez, Kimberly
    Ryan, Hannah
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [6] A twin-channel difference model for cross-calibration of thermal infrared band
    Li JiaGuo
    Gu XingFa
    Yu Tao
    Li XiaoYing
    Gao HaiLiang
    Liu Li
    Xu Hui
    SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 55 (07) : 2048 - 2056
  • [7] The Cross-Calibration of Spectral Radiances and Cross-Validation of CO2 Estimates from GOSAT and OCO-2
    Kataoka, Fumie
    Crisp, David
    Taylor, Thomas E.
    O'Dell, Chris W.
    Kuze, Akihiko
    Shiomi, Kei
    Suto, Hiroshi
    Bruegge, Carol
    Schwandner, Florian M.
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Chapsky, Lars
    Lee, Richard A. M.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 9 (11):
  • [8] Extended Pseudo Invariant Calibration Sites (EPICS) for the Cross-Calibration of Optical Satellite Sensors
    Shrestha, Mahesh
    Hasan, Md. Nahid
    Leigh, Larry
    Helder, Dennis
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (14)
  • [9] Radiometric cross-calibration of Terra ASTER and MODIS
    Yuan, Karen
    Thome, Kurt
    McCorkel, Joel
    EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS XX, 2015, 9607
  • [10] The Uncertainty of SNO Cross-Calibration for Satellite Infrared Channels
    Gu, Zhong
    Chen, Lin
    Dai, Huixing
    Tian, Lin
    Hu, Xiuqing
    Zhang, Peng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (13)