A corpus study of child heritage speakers' Spanish gender agreement

被引:20
作者
Goebel-Mahrle, Thomas [1 ]
Shin, Naomi L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Hispan Linguist, Bloomington, IN USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Linguist & Hispan Linguist, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Heritage speakers; bilingualism; US Spanish; gender agreement; GRAMMATICAL GENDER; ACQUISITION; BILINGUALISM;
D O I
10.1177/1367006920935510
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study investigates (a) whether child heritage speakers produce more gender mismatches in Spanish (un piedra"a-masc. stone-fem.") than monolingual children, (b) whether older child heritage speakers mismatch more than younger ones, and (c) linguistic contexts in which mismatches occur. Methodology: 3893 agreement forms were extracted from corpora of Spanish spoken by six monolingual children, ages 5-6 years, and three groups of US child heritage speakers: ten 5-6-year-olds, fifteen 7-8-year-olds, and twenty-one 9-11-year-olds. Data and analysis: Logistic regressions measured the impact of agreement form type, noun gender, noncanonical noun ending, and noun frequency on gender matching. One regression included 5-6-year-olds only (monolingual and heritage); the second included child heritage speakers only (5-11-year-olds). Findings: There were no significant differences between monolingual and heritage 5-6-year-olds; for these children, adjectives, direct object clitics, noncanonical nouns, and feminine nouns increased the likelihood of mismatches. Among the 5-11-year-old heritage speakers, direct object clitics referring to feminine nouns and noncanonical nouns increased the likelihood of mismatches. The 9-11-year-olds produced more gender mismatches referring to feminine nouns than the younger child heritage speakers, especially with direct object clitics. Originality: This corpus study provides evidence for high rates of gender matching and clarifies the contexts that increase the likelihood that children will mismatch. Implications: Gender matching remains an intact part of child heritage speakers' Spanish grammars. The distribution of mismatches found provides evidence of a strong article-noun association and a weaker noun-direct object clitic association. The oldest child heritage speakers' use of masculine cliticloto refer to feminine nouns may reflect an association between English "it" and Spanishlo.More generally, the finding that mismatches tend to involve masculine forms referring to feminine nouns supports the idea that masculine is the default, unmarked form in Spanish.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1104
页数:17
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Gender and number agreement in the oral production of Arabic Heritage speakers
    Albirini, Abdulkafi
    Benmamoun, Elabbas
    Chakrani, Brahim
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2013, 16 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [2] Ambadiang T., 1999, Gramaica descriptiva de la lengua espanola: Vol. 3. Entre la oracion y el discurso. Morfologia, V3, P4843
  • [3] Anderson R.T., 1999, Bilingual Research Journal, V23, P389, DOI DOI 10.1080/15235882.1999.10162742
  • [4] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [5] [Anonymous], STUDIES HISPANIC LUS
  • [6] Revisiting Masculine and Feminine Grammatical Gender in Spanish:Linguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Neurolinguistic Evidence
    Beatty-Martinez, Anne L.
    Dussias, Paola E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [7] Bilingual experience shapes language processing: Evidence from codeswitching
    Beatty-Martinez, Anne L.
    Dussias, Paola E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2017, 95 : 173 - 189
  • [8] Benedet Maira., 2004, Spanish becacesno corpus. CHILDES Data respository
  • [9] Omissions and Substitutions in Spanish Object Clitics: Developmental Optionality as a Property of the Representational System
    Castilla, Anny P.
    Perez-Leroux, Ana T.
    [J]. LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2010, 17 (1-2) : 2 - 25
  • [10] The Impact of the Spanish-to-English Proficiency Shift on the Grammaticality of English Learners
    Castilla-Earls, Anny
    Francis, David
    Iglesias, Aquiles
    Davidson, Kevin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2019, 62 (06): : 1739 - 1754