Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

被引:25
作者
Adamova, B. Micankova [1 ,2 ]
Vohanka, S. [1 ,2 ]
Dusek, L. [3 ]
Jarkovsky, J. [3 ]
Bednarik, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Hosp, Dept Neurol, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
[2] Masaryk Univ, Cent European Inst Technol, CEITEC, Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Masaryk Univ, Inst Biostat & Anal, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
关键词
Lumbar spinal stenosis; Electromyography; Outcome; Natural course; Prognosis; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NONSURGICAL MANAGEMENT; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-012-2424-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) fluctuates and is not necessarily progressive. The aim of this study was to explore the predictors of clinical outcome in patients with LSS that might eventually help to optimise the therapeutic choices. Methods A group of 56 patients (27 men, 29 women, median age 55; range 31-72 years) with clinically symptomatic mild-to-moderate LSS were re-examined after a median period of 88 months and their clinical outcomes classified as satisfactory (34 patients, 60.7 % with stable or improved clinical status) or unsatisfactory (22 patients, 39.3 % for whom clinical status deteriorated). A wide range of demographical, clinical, imaging and electrophysiological entry parameters were evaluated as possible predictors of clinical outcome. Results Unlike the demographical, clinical and imaging variables, certain electrophysiological parameters were significantly associated with unsatisfactory outcomes. There was a significantly higher prevalence of pluriradicular involvement detected by EMG in patients with unsatisfactory outcome than those with satisfactory outcome (68.2 vs. 32.3 %; p = 0.035). Patients with unsatisfactory outcome had more frequent bilateral abnormalities of the soleus H-reflex (50.0 vs. 14.7 %; p = 0.015) and lower mean H-reflex amplitude. Multivariate logistic regression proposed two variables as mutually independent predictors of unsatisfactory outcome: EMG signs of pluriradicular involvement (OR = 3.72) and averaged soleus H-reflex amplitude a parts per thousand currency sign2.8 mV (OR = 2.87). Conclusions Satisfactory outcomes were disclosed in about 61 % of the patients with mild-to-moderate LSS in a 7-year follow-up. Electrophysiological abnormalities, namely the presence of pluriradicular involvement and abnormalities of the soleus H-reflex, were predictive of deterioration of clinical status in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2611 / 2619
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Adamová B, 2000, CESK SLOV NEUROL N, V63, P261
[2]   Dynamic electrophysiological examination in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: Is it useful in clinical practice? [J].
Adamova, B ;
Vohanka, S ;
Dusek, L .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2005, 14 (03) :269-276
[3]   THE DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF H-INDEX IN S1 ROOT COMPRESSION [J].
AIELLO, I ;
ROSATI, G ;
SERRA, G ;
MANCA, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1981, 44 (02) :171-172
[4]   Lumbar spinal stenosis:: Conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study [J].
Amundsen, T ;
Weber, H ;
Nordal, HJ ;
Magnaes, B ;
Abdelnoor, M ;
Lilleås, F .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1424-1435
[5]  
ARNOLDI CC, 1976, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P4
[6]   Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis - Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Robson, D ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (05) :556-562
[7]   Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Wu, YA ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) :936-943
[8]   The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis [J].
Benoist, M .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2002, 69 (05) :450-457
[9]  
BRADDOM RI, 1974, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V55, P161
[10]   An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: Time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations [J].
Ciol, MA ;
Deyo, RA ;
Howell, E ;
Kreif, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1996, 44 (03) :285-290