Implications of Trends in Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) for Transitioning to Renewable Electricity

被引:31
|
作者
Diesendorf, M. [1 ]
Wiedmann, T. [2 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Sch Humanities & Languages, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] UNSW Sydney, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Sustainabil Assessment Program, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
EROI; EROEI; Renewable energy; Storage; Energy efficiency; Economic impact; PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR-SYSTEMS; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; INTERMITTENT WIND; LOW-COST; REGIONS; STORAGE; GENERATION; PENETRATION; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106726
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recent papers argue that the energy return on energy invested (EROI) for renewable electricity technologies and systems may be so low that the transition from fossil fuelled to renewable electricity may displace investment in other important economic sectors. For the case of large-scale electricity supply, we draw upon insights from Net Energy Analysis and renewable energy engineering to examine critically some assumptions, data and arguments in these papers, focussing on regions in which wind and solar can provide the majority of electricity. We show that the above claim is based on outdated data on EROIs, on failing to consider the energy efficiency advantages of transitioning away from fuel combustion and on overestimates of storage requirements. EROIs of wind and solar photovoltaics, which can provide the vast majority of electricity and indeed of all energy in the future, are generally high (>= 10) and increasing. The impact of storage on EROI depends on the quantities and types of storage adopted and their operational strategies. In the regions considered in this paper, the quantity of storage required to maintain generation reliability is relatively small.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Year in review-EROI or energy return on (energy) invested
    Murphy, David J.
    Hall, Charles A. S.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS REVIEWS, 2010, 1185 : 102 - 118
  • [2] Energy return on (energy) invested (EROI), oil prices, and energy transitions
    Heun, Matthew Kuperus
    de Wit, Martin
    ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 40 : 147 - 158
  • [3] Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) for the Electrical Heating of Methane Hydrate Reservoirs
    Callarotti, Roberto Cesare
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (11): : 2105 - 2114
  • [4] Energy Payback Time (EPBT) and Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) of Perovskite Tandem Photovoltaic Solar Cells
    Celik, Ilke
    Philips, Adam B.
    Song, Zhaoning
    Yan, Yanfa
    Ellingson, Randy J.
    Heben, Michael J.
    Apul, Defne
    IEEE JOURNAL OF PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2018, 8 (01): : 305 - 309
  • [5] Assessment of Indonesia's Future Renewable Energy Plan: A Meta-Analysis of Biofuel Energy Return on Investment (EROI)
    Prananta, Wiraditma
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (10)
  • [6] Trends in Scientific Literature on Energy Return Ratio of Renewable Energy Sources for Supporting Policymakers
    Rana, Roberto Leonardo
    Lombardi, Mariarosaria
    Giungato, Pasquale
    Tricase, Caterina
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (02)
  • [7] Energy payback time (EPBT) and energy return on energy invested (EROI) of solar photovoltaic systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bhandari, Khagendra P.
    Collier, Jennifer M.
    Ellingson, Randy J.
    Apul, Defne S.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 47 : 133 - 141
  • [8] Implications of Energy Return on Energy Invested on Future Total Energy Demand
    Deng, Shinuo
    Tynan, George R.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (12): : 2433 - 2442
  • [9] Energy Return On Energy Invested (EROI): A Quintessential but Possibly Inadequate Metric for Sustainability in a Solar-Powered World?
    Pickard, William F.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2014, 102 (08) : 1118 - 1122
  • [10] Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy
    Gasparatos, Alexandros
    Doll, Christopher N. H.
    Esteban, Miguel
    Ahmed, Abubakari
    Olang, Tabitha A.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 70 : 161 - 184