Happiness No Matter the Cost? An Examination on How Efficiently Individuals Reach Their Happiness Levels

被引:21
作者
Binder, Martin [1 ]
Broekel, Tom [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Econ, Evolutionary Econ Grp, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Econ Geog, Fac Geosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Happiness; Subjective well-being; Efficiency analysis; Hedonic adaptation; RELATIONAL GOODS; LIFE; SATISFACTION; INCOME; UNEMPLOYMENT; TIME; ASPIRATIONS; DISABILITY; EUROPEANS; MONEY;
D O I
10.1007/s10902-011-9283-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Happiness measures, reflecting individuals' well-being, have received increasing attention by policy makers. Policies could target absolute happiness levels when aiming at increasing a society's well-being. But given upper bounds of happiness measures, as well as the possibilities of decreasing returns to happiness resources, we argue that an important measure of interest is the efficiency with which individuals convert their resources into happiness. In order to examine the effects of policies on this efficiency and to better understand the trajectories of human well-being over time, we suggest an efficiency measure that is calculated via a nonparametric order-m approach borrowed from the production efficiency literature. Our approach is exemplified using micro level data from the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). Between 20 and 27% of the British populace are efficient in attaining happiness during our sample period. A negative influence on "happiness efficiency" is being unemployed while a positive influence is cohabitation with a partner. Our results are robust with respect to using a more comprehensive subjective well-being measure, but there are gender differences, for example in the (positive) influence that retirement has on males' efficiency, or the (positive) influence of maternity leave on females.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 645
页数:25
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Inequality and happiness: are Europeans and Americans different? [J].
Alesina, A ;
Di Tella, R ;
MacCulloch, R .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (9-10) :2009-2042
[2]  
[Anonymous], J EC INEQUALITY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NON PARAMETRIC APPRO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HEDONIC PSYCHOL SCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], LEM WORKING PAPER SE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, BRIT HOUSEHOLD PANEL
[7]  
[Anonymous], DOCUMENTATION DERIVE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2003, SOCIAL INDICATORS RE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-0387-1_7
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GENDER DISPARITY MAN
[10]  
[Anonymous], CTR EC STUDIES DISCU