Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest

被引:59
作者
Arponent, Otso [1 ,3 ]
Sudah, Mazen [1 ]
Masarwah, Amro [1 ,3 ]
Taina, Mikko [1 ,3 ]
Rautiainen, Suvi [1 ,3 ]
Kononen, Mervi [1 ]
Sironen, Reijo [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Kosma, Veli-Matti [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Sutela, Anna [1 ]
Hakumaki, Juhana [1 ]
Vanninen, Ritva [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Diagnost Imaging Ctr, Dept Clin Radiol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, SF-70210 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Kuopio Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med,Dept Clin Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[4] Univ Eastern Finland, Kuopio Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Med, Sch Med,Dept Clin Pathol & Forens Med, Kuopio, Finland
[5] Univ Eastern Finland, Canc Ctr Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; COEFFICIENT VALUE; RADIOGENOMIC ANALYSIS; CANCER; CONTRAST; LESIONS; ADC; ACCURACY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0138702
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values are increasingly reported in breast MRI. As there is no standardized method for ADC measurements, we evaluated the effect of the size of region of interest (ROI) to diagnostic utility and correlation to prognostic markers of breast cancer. Methods This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Board; the need for written informed consent for the retrospective analyses of the breast MRIs was waived by the Chair of the Hospital District. We compared diagnostic accuracy of ADC measurements from whole-lesion ROIs (WL-ROIs) to small subregions (S-ROIs) showing the most restricted diffusion and evaluated correlations with prognostic factors in 112 consecutive patients (mean age 56.2 +/- 11.6 years, 137 lesions) who underwent 3.0-T breast MRI. Results Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were substantial (k= 0.616-0.784; Intra-Class Correlation 0.589-0.831). In receiver operating characteristics analysis, differentiation between malignant and benign lesions was excellent (area under curve 0.957-0.962, cut-off ADC values for WL-ROIs: 0.87x10(-3) mm(2)s(-1); S-ROIs: 0.69x10(-3) mm(2)s(-1), P<0.001). WL-ROIs/S-ROIs achieved sensitivities of 95.7%/91.3%, specificities of 89.5%/94.7%, and overall accuracies of 89.8%/94.2%. In S-ROIs, lower ADC values correlated with presence of axillary metastases (P = 0.03), high histological grade (P = 0.006), and worsened Nottingham Prognostic Index Score (P<0.05). In both ROIs, ADC values correlated with progesterone receptors and advanced stage (P<0.01), but not with HER2, estrogen receptors, or Ki-67. Conclusions ADC values assist in breast tumor characterization. Small ROIs were more accurate than whole-lesion ROIs and more frequently associated with prognostic factors. Cut-off values differed significantly depending on measurement procedure, which should be recognized when comparing results from the literature. Instead of using a whole lesion covering ROI, a small ROI could be advocated in diffusion-weighted imaging.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database [J].
Autier, Philippe ;
Boniol, Mathieu ;
LaVecchia, Carlo ;
Vatten, Lars ;
Gavin, Anna ;
Hery, Clarisse ;
Heanue, Mary .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 341 :335
[2]   Diffusion-weighted MR for Differentiation of Breast Lesions at 3.0 T: How Does Selection of Diffusion Protocols Affect Diagnosis? [J].
Bogner, Wolfgang ;
Gruber, Stephan ;
Pinker, Katja ;
Grabner, Guenther ;
Stadlbauer, Andreas ;
Weber, Michael ;
Moser, Ewald ;
Helbich, Thomas H. ;
Trattnig, Siegfried .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (02) :341-351
[3]   Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions [J].
Cakir, Ozgur ;
Arslan, Arzu ;
Inan, Nagihan ;
Anik, Yonca ;
Sarisoy, Tahsin ;
Gumustas, Sevtap ;
Akansel, Gur .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (12) :E801-E806
[4]   Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement [J].
Cheng, Liuquan ;
Bai, Yuhan ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Liu, Mei ;
Li, Xiru ;
Zhang, Ailiang ;
Zhang, Xiaojing ;
Ma, Lin .
TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) :1537-1545
[5]  
Choi SY, 2014, BRIT J RADIOL, V85, pe474
[6]   Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness [J].
Costantini, M. ;
Belli, P. ;
Rinaldi, P. ;
Bufi, E. ;
Giardina, G. ;
Franceschini, G. ;
Petrone, G. ;
Bonomo, L. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (12) :1005-1012
[7]   Study of the Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast [J].
Dong, Haibo ;
Li, Yadi ;
Li, Hui ;
Wang, Bo ;
Hu, Bin .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (04) :265-271
[8]   Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Dorrius, Monique D. ;
Dijkstra, Hildebrand ;
Oudkerk, Matthijs ;
Sijens, Paul E. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (11) :2835-2847
[9]  
Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC cancer staging manual, V649
[10]   Glioblastoma Multiforme: Exploratory Radiogenomic Analysis by Using Quantitative Image Features [J].
Gevaert, Olivier ;
Mitchell, Lex A. ;
Achrol, Achal S. ;
Xu, Jiajing ;
Echegaray, Sebastian ;
Steinberg, Gary K. ;
Cheshier, Samuel H. ;
Napel, Sandy ;
Zaharchuk, Greg ;
Plevritis, Sylvia K. .
RADIOLOGY, 2014, 273 (01) :168-174