Pharmacological behaviour support for adults with intellectual disabilities: Frequency and predictors in a national cross-sectional survey

被引:10
作者
Phadraig, C. Mac Giolla [1 ,2 ]
Griffiths, C. [3 ]
McCallion, P. [3 ,4 ]
McCarron, M. [3 ]
Donnelly-Swift, E. [1 ,2 ]
Nunn, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dublin Dent Univ Hosp, Dept Child & Publ Dent Hlth, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Dent Sci, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Temple Univ, Sch Social Work, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
behaviour guidance; dental sedation; dentistry; general anaesthesia; intellectual disability; DENTAL TREATMENT; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; SEDATION; PEOPLE; CARE; POPULATION; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1111/cdoe.12365
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To report frequency and predictors of reported pharmacological behaviour support use among older adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) accessing dental care in Ireland. Methods: Data from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of adults with ID over 40 years of age allowed identification of the reported frequency of pharmacological behaviour support use. Predictors of pharmacological support were identified using multiple logistic regression. Results: Most older adults with ID did not report the use of any pharmacological support to receive dental care: only 0.9% reported use of inhalation sedation; 2.4% intravenous (IV) sedation; 8.6% general anaesthesia (GA); and 16.0% oral sedation. Participants reporting challenging behaviour (OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.3-2.9), significant difficulty speaking (OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.8-4.8) and obvious oral problems (OR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.6-4.1) had greater odds of reporting pharmacological, that is, GA or conscious sedation (CS), rather than nonpharmacological supports for dental care, compared to those who were not. Conclusions: People with ID report a diverse range of support use, with many using GA or CS, particularly oral sedation, for dental treatment. This highlights a need for training and governance for dentists who provide this care. Patients who present with challenging behaviour, oral problems and, interestingly, difficulty with expressive communication are more likely to report use of pharmacological supports. The above has implications for dental service design and delivery for this population.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 237
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] The use of the BDA Case Mix Model to assess the need for referral of patients to specialist dental services
    AlKindi, N. A.
    Nunn, J.
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2016, 220 (08) : 401 - 406
  • [2] [Anonymous], SURVEY DENT SERVICES
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, ORAL HLTH ADULTS INT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, MULTIVARIATE LINEAR
  • [5] Boyle C A, 2000, Dent Update, V27, P190
  • [6] Broderick Damian, 2014, J Ir Dent Assoc, V60, P38
  • [7] Chanpong B, 2005, Anesth Prog, V52, P3, DOI 10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[3:NADFSO]2.0.CO
  • [8] 2
  • [9] Conscious Sedation Procedures Using Intravenous Midazolam for Dental Care in Patients with Different Cognitive Profiles: A Prospective Study of Effectiveness and Safety
    Collado, Valerie
    Faulks, Denise
    Nicolas, Emmanuel
    Hennequin, Martine
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [10] Collado Valerie, 2008, BMC Clin Pharmacol, V8, P3, DOI 10.1186/1472-6904-8-3