New directions for zoo animal welfare science

被引:194
作者
Whitham, Jessica C. [1 ]
Wielebnowski, Nadja [2 ]
机构
[1] Brookfield Zoo, Chicago Zool Soc, Brookfield, IL 60513 USA
[2] Oregon Zoo, Portland, OR 97221 USA
关键词
Zoo animal welfare; Positive affect; Animal well-being; Animal-based assessments; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSITIVE EMOTIONAL STATES; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; HEART-RATE; DAIRY-CATTLE; DICEROS-BICORNIS; ADRENAL ACTIVITY; COGNITIVE BIAS; KEEPER RATINGS; PLAY-BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2013.02.004
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In recent years, zoos and aquaria have intensified efforts to develop approaches and tools for assessing the welfare of populations and individual animals in their care. Advances made by welfare scientists conducting studies on exotic, farm, laboratory, and companion animals have led to the emergence of a new perspective on welfare assessment in zoos. This perspective: (1) emphasizes the importance of supplementing resource-based assessments with animal-based approaches that require measures of the behavioral and/or physical state of individual animals, (2) focuses on the subjective experiences of individual animals, and (3) considers positive affective states. We propose that the zoo community also should increase efforts to integrate measures of positive affect into both population-level studies and tools for monitoring individual well-being. For years, zoo welfare researchers have conducted trans-disciplinary, multi-institutional studies to identify risk factors associated with poor welfare. In the future, large-scale research projects, as well as epidemiological studies specifically designed to examine the patterns of welfare issues within populations, should integrate behavioral, physiological, and biological measures of good well-being (e.g. play, exploratory behaviors, measures of immunological function). While the results of population-level studies can be used to refine animal care guidelines, individual animals should be monitored to ensure that their needs are being met. Furthermore, after determining how to elicit positive affective states in individual animals, the zoo community should attempt to promote these states by offering positive experiences. We describe two strategies that zoos can currently pursue to facilitate the occurrence of positive affective states: (1) provide animals with stimulating opportunities to overcome challenges, make choices, and have some level of control over their environments, and (2) promote appropriate and beneficial keeper animal relationships. Ultimately, we hope that as welfare researchers gain a better understanding of how to assess and promote good well-being, zoos and aquaria can apply these findings to actively strive toward achieving the best possible welfare for all animals in their care. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 260
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   On the need to redress an inadequacy in animal welfare science: toward an internally coherent framework [J].
Fenton, Andrew .
BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 27 (01) :73-93
[42]   Animal Welfare and the Paradox of Animal Consciousness [J].
Dawkins, Marian .
ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR, VOL 47, 2015, 47 :5-38
[43]   Investigating Welfare Metrics for Snakes at the Saint Louis Zoo [J].
Augustine, Lauren ;
Baskir, Eli ;
Kozlowski, Corinne P. ;
Hammack, Stephen ;
Elden, Justin ;
Wanner, Mark D. ;
Franklin, Ashley D. ;
Powell, David M. .
ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (03)
[44]   Animal welfare on Argentinean dairy farms based on the Welfare Quality® protocol framework [J].
Lazzarini, Belen ;
Llonch, Pol ;
Baudracco, Javier .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR AND BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2024, 12 (02)
[45]   The effects of music on animal physiology, behavior and welfare [J].
Alworth, Leanne C. ;
Buerkle, Shawna C. .
LAB ANIMAL, 2013, 42 (02) :54-61
[46]   Application of an animal welfare assessment system for policy evaluation: Does the Farm Investment Scheme improve animal welfare in subsidised new stables? [J].
Bergschmidt, Angela ;
Schrader, Lars .
LANDBAUFORSCHUNG VOLKENRODE, 2009, 59 (02) :95-103
[47]   Freedom and Animal Welfare [J].
Browning, Heather ;
Veit, Walter .
ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (04)
[48]   Vaccines and animal welfare [J].
Morton, D. B. .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2007, 26 (01) :157-163
[49]   Assessing animal welfare: a triangulation of preference, judgement bias and other candidate welfare indicators [J].
Paul, Elizabeth S. ;
Browne, William ;
Mendl, Michael T. ;
Caplen, Gina ;
Trevarthen, Anna ;
Held, Suzanne ;
Nicol, Christine J. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 186 :151-177
[50]   Review of the assessment of animal welfare with special emphasis on the "Welfare Quality® animal welfare assessment protocol for growing pigs" [J].
Czycholl, I. ;
Buettner, K. ;
Beilage, E. Grosse ;
Krieter, J. .
ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 2015, 58 :237-249