The comparison of discrete ordinate and Monte Carlo methods in solving of the radiation transfer equations in a heterogenous reactor

被引:5
作者
Asadollahfardi, G. [1 ]
Noori, M. [1 ]
Asadi, M. [2 ]
Taherioun, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Kharazmi Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Tehran 1571914911, Iran
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Engn Dept, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
[3] Isfahan Univ Technol, Civil Engn Dept, Esfahan, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA | 2018年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
discrete ordinate (DO) method; Monte Carlo (MC) method; photoreactor; radiation transfer equation (RTE); ultraviolet (UV) lamp; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS; FLUENCE RATE DISTRIBUTIONS; UV REACTOR; PHOTOCATALYTIC REACTORS; ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION; WATER-TREATMENT; MODEL; REFLECTION; SCATTERING; PHOTOREACTOR;
D O I
10.2166/aqua.2017.058
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Photoreactor applications in water and wastewater treatment has been increased in recent years. The simulation of radiation distribution inside the reactors allows the optimization of its operation. The radiation transfer equation (RTE) illustrates the field radiation. We applied the discrete ordinate (DO) method to solve the RTE and computed the local volumetric rate of energy absorption (LVREA) in a photoreactor, consisting of a Ultra Violet (UV) lamp and titanium dioxide Degussa P25 (TiO2 DP 25) catalyst. First, GAMBIT 2.4.6 was employed to model the reactor in three dimensions. The simulation of the radiation distribution was carried out using FLUENT 14.5 software in the framework of a multiple point source summation (MPSS) model. The robustness of the DO approach was assessed by comparing with the Monte Carlo (MC) method and experimental data. The coefficient of determination (R-2) and index of agreement (IA) of DO and experimental data were 0.95 and 0.93, respectively. The DO and MC had a good convergence in the low concentrations of TiO2 DP 25. In the concentrations between 0.03 g/l to 0.15 g/l, the difference with experimental data increased. In the concentration of 0.15 g/l, and beyond, the both methods and experimental data were in a good agreement.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 118
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Comparison of ultraviolet (UV) radiation intensity between a single lamp and a double lamp in a reactors [J].
Asadollahfardi, Gholamreza ;
Molaei, Matin ;
Taheriyoun, Masoud ;
Leversage, Ivan .
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 9 (04) :558-565
[2]   Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of VUV/UV photoreactors for water treatment [J].
Bagheri, Mehdi ;
Mohseni, Madjid .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 256 :51-60
[3]   Calculation of ultraviolet fluence rate distributions in an annular reactor: Significance of refraction and reflection [J].
Bolton, JR .
WATER RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (13) :3315-3324
[4]   Absolute quantum yields in photocatalytic slurry reactors [J].
Brandi, RJ ;
Citroni, MA ;
Alfano, OM ;
Cassano, AE .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2003, 58 (3-6) :979-985
[5]   PHOTOREACTOR ANALYSIS AND DESIGN - FUNDAMENTALS AND APPLICATIONS [J].
CASSANO, AE ;
MARTIN, CA ;
BRANDI, RJ ;
ALFANO, OM .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1995, 34 (07) :2155-2201
[6]   A kinetic model for H2O2/UV process in a completely mixed batch reactor [J].
Crittenden, JC ;
Hu, SM ;
Hand, DW ;
Green, SA .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (10) :2315-2328
[7]  
Elyasi S., 2005, 3 INT C ULTR TECHN W
[8]  
Elyasi S, 2009, DEV UV PHOTOREACTOR, DOI [10.14288/1.0058653, DOI 10.14288/1.0058653]
[9]   Simulation of UV Photoreactor for Degradation of Chemical Contaminants: Model Development and Evaluation [J].
Elyasi, Siamak ;
Taghipour, Fariborz .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (06) :2056-2063
[10]   SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS AS A SPECIFICATION ERROR [J].
HECKMAN, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) :153-161