Cryogenic vs. absorption biogas upgrading in liquefied biomethane production - An energy efficiency analysis

被引:51
作者
Hashemi, Sayed Ebrahim [1 ]
Sarker, Shiplu [1 ]
Lien, Kristian M. [1 ]
Schnell, Sondre K. [2 ]
Austbo, Bjorn [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Liquefied biomethane; Cryogenic upgrading; Chemical absorption upgrading; Methane utilization; SWING ADSORPTION; LNG; CO2; PURIFICATION; EXERGY; DESIGN; LIQUEFACTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERSPECTIVES; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.172
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Production of liquefied biomethane (LBM) from biogas comprises two major energy intensive processes; upgrading to increase the methane concentration and refrigeration to liquefy the upgraded biogas. Amine-based absorption has been considered an attractive option for biogas upgrading in industrial applications. The temperature increase associated with amine regeneration is, however, in conflict with the cooling requirement of the subsequent liquefaction process. Hence, cryogenic biogas upgrading, integrated with liquefaction, has emerged as an interesting alternative. In this paper, a rigorous energy analysis was performed for comprehensive models of the two aforementioned LBM production alternatives. Both processes were modeled using Aspen HYSYS (R) and optimized to minimize the energy use. The results indicate that the integrated cryogenic upgrading process is favorable in terms of both overall energy efficiency and methane utilization. Moreover, the energy analysis implies that the liquefaction process accounts for the major part of the energy input to an LBM plant, demonstrating the significance of improving the energy efficiency of the liquefaction process in order to improve the overall performance of the LBM process.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 304
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives
    Angelidaki, Irini
    Treu, Laura
    Tsapekos, Panagiotis
    Luo, Gang
    Campanaro, Stefano
    Wenzel, Henrik
    Kougias, Panagiotis G.
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2018, 36 (02) : 452 - 466
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, Technology Roadmap: Delivering Sustainable Bioenergy
  • [3] LNG as vehicle fuel and the problem of supply: The Italian case study
    Arteconi, A.
    Polonara, F.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 503 - 512
  • [4] An Extended Pinch Analysis and Design procedure utilizing pressure based exergy for subambient cooling
    Aspelund, Audun
    Berstad, David Olsson
    Gundersen, Truls
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 27 (16) : 2633 - 2649
  • [5] Aspentech, 2017, ASP HYS GUID PROP ME
  • [6] Pressure swing adsorption for biogas upgrading. A new process configuration for the separation of biomethane and carbon dioxide
    Augelletti, Rosaria
    Conti, Maria
    Annesini, Maria Cristina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 1390 - 1398
  • [7] Annotated bibliography-Use of optimization in LNG process design and operation
    Austbo, Bjorn
    Lovseth, Sigurd Weidemann
    Gundersen, Truls
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 71 : 391 - 414
  • [8] Low temperature techniques for natural gas purification and LNG production: An energy and exergy analysis
    Baccanelli, Margaret
    Lange, Stefano
    Rocco, Matteo V.
    Pellegrini, Laura A.
    Colombo, Emanuela
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 180 : 546 - 559
  • [9] Small scale bio-LNG plant: Comparison of different biogas upgrading techniques
    Baccioli, A.
    Antonelli, M.
    Frigo, S.
    Desideri, U.
    Pasini, G.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 217 : 328 - 335
  • [10] Biogas upgrading - technology overview, comparison and perspectives for the future
    Bauer, Fredric
    Persson, Tobias
    Hulteberg, Christian
    Tamm, Daniel
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2013, 7 (05): : 499 - 511