Engaging early childhood teachers in participatory co-design workshops to educate young children about bullying

被引:6
作者
Ey, Lesley-Anne [1 ]
Spears, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Educ Futures, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
Co-design; participatory design; co-researchers; bullying education; early childhood; DEFINITIONS; METHODOLOGY; AGGRESSION; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/02643944.2020.1788129
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Children involved in bullying are vulnerable to social, physiological, psychological, educational, behavioural, and adjustment problems which can persist into adulthood. In Australia, formal education about bullying is not introduced until year four (age 9), making pastoral care and addressing bullying in junior primary (ages 4-8) the responsibility of early childhood teachers. This study employed a participatory co-design framework with 12 South Australian early childhood teachers to co-design and implement a tailored bullying education/prevention program, informed by students' understanding of bullying. Co-design methods included small group interviews, discussion, and modified Q sort techniques to support teachers in identifying and defining the magnitude of the problem; determining why it occurs and; designing a contextualised intervention. A test-retest quasi experimental design/evaluation framework was developed to explore the co-design and program implementation processes. All teachers (N=12) reported the co-design process was enjoyable, energizing, and engaging/informative and would use their new skills to modify and implement their program with future classes. Teachers reported children were highly engaged during implementation. Children's responses (N=99) post-intervention showed significant improvement in their understanding when describing bullying. Strengths and limitations of employing co-design processes to develop tailored educational programs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 253
页数:24
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, School violence and bullying: Global status report
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, REV PROCEDURES PROCE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, REPORT EVALUATION SA
[4]  
Australian Curriculum and Assessment Reporting Authority (ACARA), 2012, Guide to understanding ICSEA
[5]   Racism and Othering for South Sudanese heritage students in Australian schools: is inclusion possible? [J].
Baak, Melanie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2019, 23 (02) :125-141
[6]  
Bodkin-Andrews G., 2017, Indigenous Children Growing Up Strong, P153, DOI DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-53435-4_8
[7]   Participatory Design of Technology for Inclusive Education: A Case Study [J].
Braz, Leonara de Medeiros ;
Ramos, Eliane de Souza ;
Pozzebom Benedetti, Maria Luisa ;
Hornung, Heiko .
UNIVERSAL ACCESS IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: HUMAN AND TECHNOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTS, PT III, 2017, 10279 :168-187
[8]   Q methodology and qualitative research [J].
Brown, SR .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (04) :561-567
[9]  
Calkins H, 2017, J ARRYTHM, V33, P369, DOI 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001
[10]   Bullying in preschool: The associations between participant roles, social competence, and social preference [J].
Camodeca, Marina ;
Caravita, Simona C. S. ;
Coppola, Gabrielle .
AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2015, 41 (04) :310-321