Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization

被引:30
作者
Qiao, Xiaomei [1 ,2 ]
Forster, Kenneth I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
关键词
L2 lexical acquisition; L2; lexicon; Masked priming; ORTHOGRAPHIC NEIGHBORS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ENGLISH BILINGUALS; SKILLED READERS; SENSE MODEL; RECOGNITION; CONSOLIDATION; 2ND-LANGUAGE; ACQUISITION; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.026
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Studies on the representation of newly learned words in the native language show that after repeated sessions of learning, novel words produce less form priming than nonwords when they are used as primes in a masked priming experiment. This suggests that the newly learned words have established lexical representations, and therefore start to behave more like real words than nonwords (Qiao & Forster, 2013). Since adult language learning normally happens in a foreign language context rather than in the native language context, it is important to see whether similar results could be obtained if bilingual subjects were taught novel words in their second language (L2) rather than their first language (L1). The current experiment explores this issue using the same procedure and materials as used in the L1 experiment. Results show that in contrast to the nonsignificant priming observed with the Ll speakers, L2 speakers show enhanced facilitatory priming after the same training process. In addition, a significant facilitatory priming effect is also obtained with real words as primes, suggesting that the L1 and L2 lexicons might work in rather different ways. One possibility is that the L2 lexicon is not represented in the same type of memory system as the L1 lexicon, rather it is represented in a system where competitive effects are not observed. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 152
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Word class effect on L2 ambiguous word acquisition: Evidence from ERPs [J].
Yang, Xuefeng ;
Liang, Lijuan ;
Chen, Baoguo .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2023, 68
[32]   L2 cross-linguistic influence on L1 perception: Evidence from heritage speakers and long-term immigrants [J].
Seo, Yuhyeon ;
Dmitrieva, Olga .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2024, 104
[33]   Sensitivity to Filler-Gap Dependency Violations in the L1 vs. L2: Evidence from Speeded Judgement Tasks [J].
Trifonova, Aleksandra ;
Felser, Claudia .
LANGUAGES, 2025, 10 (02)
[34]   Processing syntactic and semantic information in the L2: Evidence for differential cue-weighting in the L1 and L2 [J].
Deniz, Nazik Dinctopal .
BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2022, 25 (05) :713-725
[35]   The processing and representation of verbal inflection: Data from L1 and L2 Spanish [J].
Yaden, Bridget .
HISPANIA-A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE TEACHING OF SPANISH AND PORTUGUESE, 2007, 90 (04) :795-808
[36]   The dative alternation in L2 German? Conceptualization transfer from L1 Dutch [J].
Baten, Kristof ;
De Cuypere, Ludovic .
VIAL-VIGO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2014, 11 :9-40
[37]   The effects of L2 proficiency on L2 word reading strategies: evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals [J].
Zhao, Rong ;
Wei, Hang ;
Yao, Zhao .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2025,
[38]   The effects of L2 proficiency on L2 word reading strategies: evidence from Chinese-English bilinguals [J].
Zhao, Rong ;
Wei, Hang ;
Yao, Zhao .
APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2024, 45 (06) :1147-1164
[39]   Effects of L1 orthography and L1 phonology on L2 English pronunciation [J].
Mairano, Paolo ;
Bassetti, Bene ;
Sokolovic-Perovic, Mirjana ;
Cerni, Tania .
REVUE FRANCAISE DE LINGUISTIQUE APPLIQUEE, 2018, 23 (01) :45-57
[40]   WORD FREQUENCY, COLLOCATIONAL FREQUENCY, L1 CONGRUENCY, AND PROFICIENCY IN L2 COLLOCATIONAL PROCESSING WHAT ACCOUNTS FOR L2 PERFORMANCE? [J].
Wolter, Brent ;
Yamashita, Junko .
STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2018, 40 (02) :395-416