Climatic niche shifts are common in introduced plants

被引:195
作者
Atwater, Daniel Z. [1 ,2 ]
Ervine, Carissa [2 ]
Barney, Jacob N. [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Dept Plant Pathol Physiol & Weed Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
关键词
SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; CONSERVATISM; RANGES; MODELS; PREDICTION; INVASIONS; ECOLOGY; SPACE;
D O I
10.1038/s41559-017-0396-z
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Our understanding of how climate influences species distributions and our ability to assess the risk of introduced species depend on the assumption that species' climatic niches remain stable across space and time. While niche shifts have been detected in individual invasive species, one assessment of similar to 50 plants in Europe and North America concluded that niche shifts were rare, while another concluded the opposite. These contradictory findings, limited in species number and geographic scope, leave open a need to understand how often introduced species experience niche shifts and whether niche shifts can be predicted. We found evidence of climatic niche shifts in 65-100% of 815 terrestrial plant species introduced across five continents, depending on how niche shifts were measured. Individual species responses were idiosyncratic, but we generally saw that niche shifts reflected changes in climate availability at the continent scale and were largest in long-lived and cultivated species. Smaller intercontinental niche shifts occurred within species' native ranges. Overall, the climatic niches of terrestrial plant species were not conserved as they crossed continents. These results have major consequences for applying environmental niche models to assess the risk of invasive species and for predicting species responses to climate change. Our findings challenge the tenet that species' niches are conserved aspects of their ecology.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? [J].
Fitzpatrick, Matthew C. ;
Weltzin, Jake F. ;
Sanders, Nathan J. ;
Dunn, Robert R. .
GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 16 (01) :24-33
[12]   Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia [J].
Gallagher, Rachael V. ;
Beaumont, Linda J. ;
Hughes, Lesley ;
Leishman, Michelle R. .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2010, 98 (04) :790-799
[13]   Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models [J].
Guisan, A ;
Thuiller, W .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2005, 8 (09) :993-1009
[14]   Unifying niche shift studies: insights from biological invasions [J].
Guisan, Antoine ;
Petitpierre, Blaise ;
Broennimann, Olivier ;
Daehler, Curtis ;
Kueffer, Christoph .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (05) :260-269
[15]  
Halekoh U, 2014, J STAT SOFTW, V59, P1
[16]  
Hijmans R., 2016, RASTER GEOGRAPHIC DA, P3
[17]   Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas [J].
Hijmans, RJ ;
Cameron, SE ;
Parra, JL ;
Jones, PG ;
Jarvis, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2005, 25 (15) :1965-1978
[18]   Use of niche models in invasive species risk assessments [J].
Jimenez-Valverde, A. ;
Peterson, A. T. ;
Soberon, J. ;
Overton, J. M. ;
Aragon, P. ;
Lobo, J. M. .
BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2011, 13 (12) :2785-2797
[19]   Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis [J].
Keane, RM ;
Crawley, MJ .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2002, 17 (04) :164-170
[20]   Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood [J].
Kenward, MG ;
Roger, JH .
BIOMETRICS, 1997, 53 (03) :983-997