Life cycle assessment of the solar thermal power plant integrated with air-cooled supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle

被引:37
作者
Xiao, Tingyu [1 ]
Liu, Chao [1 ]
Wang, Xurong [2 ]
Wang, Shukun [1 ]
Xu, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Li, Qibin [1 ]
Li, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Key Lab Low Grade Energy Utilizat Technol & Syst, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400030, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ Urban Construct, Sch Energy & Bldg Environm Engn, Pingdingshan 467036, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Concentrating solar power; Supercritical carbon dioxide brayton cycle; Different layouts; Life cycle assessment; Uncertainty analysis; CSP; OPTIMIZATION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO(2)) Brayton cycle offers the potential of higher thermal efficiency and lower costs of electricity generation for concentrated solar power (CSP) applications. Besides its economic potential, the environmental sustainability needs to be examined. For this purpose, detailed life cycle assessment (LCA) of the solar driven sCO(2) power generation system is carried out. The pollutant emissions and primary energy consumptions of the CSP plant with two typical sCO(2) Brayton cycles including simple recuperative cycle and recompression cycle are analyzed and compared. Global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), respiratory effects potential (REP) are obtained. The life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of parabolic trough (PT) plant with sCO(2) cycle and steam Rankine cycle are compared. Finally, uncertainty analysis is carried out to study the effect of environmental factors (solar irradiation and ambient temperature) and parameter design of the PT system (turbine inlet temperature, life span and thermal energy storage (TES) capacity) on the LCA results and ensure the reliable comparison. It is found that for the PT plant with sCO(2) power cycle, the auxiliary electricity consumption from the grid, TES and solar field manufacture account for 92% of the total environmental impact and 98% of the total energy consumption, while sCO(2) power cycle only accounts for a small part. The environmental performance of the recompression layout is better than that of the simple recuperative layout. For the CSP application, the GHG emissions of the sCO(2) cycle are 21%similar to 41% less than that of the steam Rankine cycle. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 133
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower [J].
Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A. ;
Atif, Maimoon .
ENERGY, 2015, 82 :61-71
[2]   PERSPECTIVES FOR LIQUID PHASE COMPRESSION GAS TURBINE [J].
ANGELINO, G .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER, 1967, 89 (02) :229-&
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, P 11 INT MOD C PAL C
[4]   Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants [J].
Binotti, Marco ;
Astolfi, Marco ;
Campanari, Stefano ;
Manzolini, Giampaolo ;
Silva, Paolo .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 204 :1007-1017
[5]  
Bloemkolk JanW., 1996, J CLEAN PROD, V4, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00022-4
[6]   Life Cycle Assessment of a Parabolic Trough Concentrating Solar Power Plant and the Impacts of Key Design Alternatives [J].
Burkhardt, John J., III ;
Heath, Garvin A. ;
Turchi, Craig S. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (06) :2457-2464
[7]  
Chapman D.J., 2009, P SCCO 2 POW CYCL S
[8]   Benchmarking supercritical carbon dioxide cycles against steam Rankine cycles for Concentrated Solar Power [J].
Cheang, V. T. ;
Hedderwick, R. A. ;
McGregor, C. .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2015, 113 :199-211
[9]   Life cycle assessment of concentrated solar power (CSP) and the influence of hybridising with natural gas [J].
Corona, Blanca ;
San Miguel, Guillermo ;
Cerrajero, Eduardo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (06) :1264-1275
[10]   Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review [J].
Crespi, Francesco ;
Gavagnin, Giacomo ;
Sanchez, David ;
Martinez, Gonzalo S. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 :152-183