Comparative antibacterial activity of commercial chitosan and chitosan extracted from Auricularia sp.

被引:70
作者
Chang, Angela Kae T. [1 ]
Frias, Ronaldo R., Jr. [1 ]
Alvarez, Lourdes V. [1 ]
Bigol, Ursela G. [2 ]
Guzman, John Paul Matthew D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Polytech Univ Philippines, Coll Sci, Manila, Philippines
[2] Ind Technol Dev Inst, Dept Sci & Technol, Taguig City, Philippines
[3] Univ Santo Tomas, Grad Sch, Manila, Philippines
关键词
Antibacterial Activity; Auricularia sp; Chitosan; Escherichia coli; Staphylococcus aureus; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MODE;
D O I
10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.016
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The threat of antimicrobial resistance continues to rise, hence the need for the discovery of new antibiotics, especially from alternative sources like plants, fungi and other organisms, also increases. In this study, chitosan is derived from Auricularia sp., and its antibacterial property, together with commercial chitosan, were evaluated against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Chitinous material from Auricularia sp. were deproteinized and deacetylated using different concentrations of NaOH at varying temperature for hours. Extracted and commercial chitosan were verified through FT-IR Analysis, and deacetylation degrees of the two were also determined. FT-IR Analysis showed that both chitosan have similar trends in the FT-IR spectrum but differ in deacetylation degrees. The results also showed concentration-dependent antibacterial activities of both extracted and commercial chitosan against E. coli and S. aureus wherein as the concentration increases, the activity also increases. Moreover, both chitosan exhibited greater activities against S. aureus than in E. coli, and it was revealed that they exhibit significantly higher activities against Streptomycin sulfate against S. aureus and comparable activities against E. coli. Overall, the results have showed that the chitosan extracted from Auricularia sp. exhibited greater antibacterial activities on both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria compared with the commercial chitosan.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Antimicrobial activity of wild mushroom extracts against clinical isolates resistant to different antibiotics
    Alves, M. J.
    Ferreira, I. C. F. R.
    Martins, A.
    Pintado, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 113 (02) : 466 - 475
  • [2] A Review of the Antimicrobial Activity of Chitosan
    Goy, Rejane C.
    de Britto, Douglas
    Assis, Odilio B. G.
    [J]. POLIMEROS-CIENCIA E TECNOLOGIA, 2009, 19 (03): : 241 - 247
  • [3] Antibacterial activity in higher fungi (mushrooms) and endophytic fungi from Slovenia
    Janes, Damjan
    Kreft, Samo
    Jurc, Maja
    Seme, Katja
    Strukelj, Borut
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (09) : 700 - 706
  • [4] JONG SC, 1989, ADV APPL MICROBIOL, V34, P183
  • [5] Kirby G., 2003, MUSHROOMS TOADSTOOLS
  • [6] Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and mode of action: A state of the art review
    Kong, Ming
    Chen, Xi Guang
    Xing, Ke
    Park, Hyun Jin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 144 (01) : 51 - 63
  • [7] HaCaT Keratinocytes Response on Antimicrobial Atelocollagen Substrates: Extent of Cytotoxicity, Cell Viability and Proliferation
    Lopez-Garcia, Jorge
    Lehocky, Marian
    Humpolicek, Petr
    Saha, Petr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2014, 5 (02): : 43 - 57
  • [8] Mesa Ospina N., 2015, J MATER SCI-MATER M, V26, P1
  • [9] No H., 2002, INT J FOOD MICROBIOL, P1
  • [10] Paul J., 2017, MICROBIOL RES J INT, V22, P1, DOI [10.9734/MRJI/2017/37450, DOI 10.9734/MRJI/2017/37450]