Why has the Chinese communist state remained so durable in an age of democratization? Contrary to existing theories, this article argues that the strong state coercive capacity has survived the authoritarian rule in China. We demonstrate that the Chinese Communist Party has taken deliberate actions to enhance the cohesion of its coercive organizations the police, in particular by distributing "spoils of public office" to police chiefs. In addition, the state has extended the scope of its coercion by increasing police funding in localities where the state sector loses control of the population. We use and rely on mixed methods to test this theory. (C) 2014 The Regents of the University of California. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机构:
China Agr Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R ChinaChina Agr Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
Liu, Zhuo-wan
Balezentis, Tomas
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Vilnius Univ, Fac Econ & Business Adm, LT-10222 Vilnius, LithuaniaChina Agr Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
Balezentis, Tomas
Song, Yao-yao
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R ChinaChina Agr Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
Song, Yao-yao
Yang, Guo-liang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Sci & Dev, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Beijing 100049, Peoples R ChinaChina Agr Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China