Quality of Life and Toxicity From Passively Scattered and Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

被引:29
作者
Pugh, Thomas J. [1 ]
Munsell, Mark F. [2 ]
Choi, Seungtaek [1 ]
Quyhn Nhu Nguyen [1 ]
Mathai, Benson [1 ]
Zhu, X. Ron [3 ]
Sahoo, Narayan [3 ]
Gillin, Michael [3 ]
Johnson, Jennifer L. [3 ]
Amos, Richard A. [3 ]
Dong, Lei [4 ]
Mahmood, Usama [1 ]
Kuban, Deborah A. [1 ]
Frank, Steven J. [1 ]
Hoffman, Karen E. [1 ]
McGuire, Sean E. [1 ]
Lee, Andrew K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Scripps Proton Therapy Ctr, San Diego, CA USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2013年 / 87卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CONFORMAL RADIATION-THERAPY; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; BOOST THERAPY; PHASE I/II; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; TRIAL; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.032
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To report quality of life (QOL)/toxicity in men treated with proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare outcomes between passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT). Methods and Materials: Men with localized prostate cancer enrolled on a prospective QOL protocol with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Comparative groups were defined by technique (PSPT vs SSPT). Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires at baseline and every 3-6 months after proton beam therapy. Clinically meaningful differences in QOL were defined as >= 0.5 x baseline standard deviation. The cumulative incidence of modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade >= 2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity and argon plasma coagulation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 226 men received PSPT, and 65 received SSPT. Both PSPT and SSPT resulted in statistically significant changes in sexual, urinary, and bowel Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite summary scores. Only bowel summary, function, and bother resulted in clinically meaningful decrements beyond treatment completion. The decrement in bowel QOL persisted through 24-month follow-up. Cumulative grade >= 2 GU and GI toxicity at 24 months were 13.4% and 9.6%, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 GI toxicity (PSPT group) and no other grade >= 3 GI or GU toxicity. Argon plasma coagulation application was infrequent (PSPT 4.4% vs SSPT 1.5%; P=.21). No statistically significant differences were appreciated between PSPT and SSPT regarding toxicity or QOL. Conclusion: Both PSPT and SSPT confer low rates of grade >2 GI or GU toxicity, with preservation of meaningful sexual and urinary QOL at 24 months. A modest, yet clinically meaningful, decrement in bowel QOL was seen throughout follow-up. No toxicity or QOL differences between PSPT and SSPT were identified. Long-term comparative results in a larger patient cohort are warranted. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 953
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Comparison of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) to Passively Scattered Proton Therapy (PSPT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer
    Choi, S.
    Amin, M.
    Palmer, M.
    Zhu, X. R.
    Nguyen, Q.
    Pugh, T. J.
    Kuban, D. A.
    Lee, A. K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S154 - S155
  • [2] Coen John J, 2012, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, V82, pe201, DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.048
  • [3] A comparison of proton therapy and IMRT treatment plans for prostate radiotherapy
    Dowdell, S. J.
    Metcalfe, P. E.
    Morales, J. E.
    Jackson, M.
    Rosenfeld, A. B.
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2008, 31 (04) : 325 - 331
  • [4] DUTTENHAVER JR, 1983, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V51, P1599, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19830501)51:9<1599::AID-CNCR2820510908>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-O
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcomes After 3-Dimensional Conformal, Intensity-Modulated, or Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Gray, Phillip J.
    Paly, Jonathan J.
    Yeap, Beow Y.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Sandler, Howard. M.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    Talcott, James A.
    Coen, John J.
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    Shipley, William U.
    Hahn, Stephen M.
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Bekelman, Justin E.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    [J]. CANCER, 2013, 119 (09) : 1729 - 1735
  • [7] Multi-institutional Prospective Evaluation of Bowel Quality of Life After Prostate External Beam Radiation Therapy Identifies Patient and Treatment Factors Associated With Patient-Reported Outcomes: The PROSTQA Experience
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    Conlon, Anna S. C.
    Daignault, Stephanie
    Dunn, Rodney L.
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Hembroff, A. Larry
    Zietman, Anthony L.
    Kaplan, Irving
    Ciezki, Jay
    Kuban, Deborah A.
    Wei, John T.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Michalski, Jeff M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 86 (03): : 546 - 553
  • [8] Erectile function, incontinence, and other quality of life outcomes following proton therapy for prostate cancer in men 60 years old and younger
    Hoppe, Bradford S.
    Nichols, Romaine C.
    Henderson, Randal H.
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Williams, Christopher R.
    Costa, Joseph
    Marcus, Robert B., Jr.
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Li, Zuofeng
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    [J]. CANCER, 2012, 118 (18) : 4619 - 4626
  • [9] A Treatment Planning Comparison of Passive-Scattering and Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Typical Tumor Sites
    Kase, Yuki
    Yamashita, Haruo
    Fuji, Hiroshi
    Yamamoto, Yuichi
    Pu, Yuehu
    Tsukishima, Chihiro
    Murayama, Shigeyuki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2012, 53 (02) : 272 - 280
  • [10] EARLY OUTCOMES FROM THREE PROSPECTIVE TRIALS OF IMAGE-GUIDED PROTON THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Mendenhall, Nancy P.
    Li, Zuofeng
    Hoppe, Bradford S.
    Marcus, Robert B., Jr.
    Mendenhall, William M.
    Nichols, R. Charles
    Morris, Christopher G.
    Williams, Christopher R.
    Costa, Joseph
    Henderson, Randal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (01): : 213 - 221