Where are the idealists in interwar International Relations?

被引:54
作者
Ashworth, Lucian M.
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0260210506007030
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
International Relations (IR) textbooks often make reference to an idealist paradigm in interwar IR. This article argues that an idealist paradigm did not exist, and that interwar references to idealism or utopianism are contradictory and have little to do with defining a paradigm. Not only is there no idealist paradigm in IR at this time, but authors from the interwar period that have since been dismissed as idealists rarely share the attributes assigned to idealism or utopianism by later writers. If IR scholars are serious about understanding the history of their discipline then they will have to stop applying misleading and anachronistic terms like idealism.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 308
页数:18
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [21] BRAILSFORD HN, 1945, COMMUNICATION 0923
  • [22] BRAILSFORD HN, 1928, OLIVES ENDLESS AGE, pCH3
  • [23] BRINTON H, 1935, CAPITALISM CAUSE WAR, P13
  • [24] BURNS CD, 1924, FOREIGN AFFAIRS 0706, P9
  • [25] Butterfield H., 1951, International Affairs, V27, P411
  • [26] Camp William., 1960, GLITTERING PRIZES BI, P207
  • [27] CARR EH, 1939, 20 YEARS CRISIS, P278
  • [28] CARR EH, 1945, NATL AFTER, P47
  • [29] CARR EH, 1948, INT RELATIONS 2 WORL, P5
  • [30] DEAMADARIAGA S, 1938, WORLDS DESIGN, P54