Predictive factors of urinary retention following prostate brachytherapy

被引:73
作者
Bucci, J
Morris, WJ
Keyes, M
Spadinger, I
Sidhu, S
Moravan, V
机构
[1] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Vancouver Canc Ctr, Dept Phys, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2002年 / 53卷 / 01期
关键词
prostate brachytherapy; edema; urinary morbidity; catheterization rate;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(01)02812-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the incidence and duration of urinary retention requiring catheterization and the factors predictive for these end points. Methods and Materials: Two hundred eighty-two patients treated with prostate brachytherapy alone were evaluated. Clinical and treatment-related factors examined included: age, baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), presence of comorbidity, planning ultrasound target volume (PUTV), postimplant prostate CT scan volume, the CT:PUTV ratio, number of seeds inserted, number of needles used, use of neoadjuvant hormones, procedural physician, clinical stage, Gleason score, and pretreatment PSA. Dosimetric quality indicators were also examined. Results: Urinary obstruction after prostate brachytherapy developed in 43 (15%) patients. The median duration of catheter insertion was 21 days (mean 49, range 1-365). Univariate analysis demonstrated that presence of diabetes, preimplant volume, postimplant volume, CT:PUTV ratio, number of needles, and dosimetric parameters were predictive for catheterization. However, in multivariate analysis, only the baseline IPSS, CT:PUTV ratio, and presence of diabetes were significant independent predictive factors for catheterization. Conclusion: Baseline IPSS was the most important predictive factor for postimplantation catheterization. The extent of postimplant edema, as reflected by the CT:PUTV ratio, predicted for need and duration of catheterization. The presence of diabetes was predictive for catheterization, but may relate to the absence of prophylactic steroids, and therefore requires further evaluation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   THE AMERICAN-UROLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA [J].
BARRY, MJ ;
FOWLER, FJ ;
OLEARY, MP ;
BRUSKEWITZ, RC ;
HOLTGREWE, HL ;
MEBUST, WK ;
COCKETT, ATK ;
BLAIVAS, JG ;
WEIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (05) :1549-1557
[2]   Palladium-103 brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma [J].
Blasko, JC ;
Grimm, PD ;
Sylvester, JE ;
Badiozamani, KR ;
Hoak, D ;
Cavanagh, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (04) :839-850
[3]  
BLASKO JC, 1991, SCAND J UROL NEPHROL, P113
[4]   Comparison of seed loading approaches in prostate brachytherapy [J].
Butler, WM ;
Merrick, GS ;
Lief, JH ;
Dorsey, AT .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (02) :381-392
[5]   Pd-103 brachytherapy and external beam irradiation for clinically localized, high-risk prostatic carcinoma [J].
Dattoli, M ;
Wallner, K ;
Sorace, R ;
Koval, J ;
Cash, J ;
Acosta, R ;
Brown, C ;
Etheridge, J ;
Binder, M ;
Brunelle, R ;
Kirwan, N ;
Sanchez, S ;
Stein, D ;
Wasserman, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (05) :875-879
[6]  
Desai J, 1998, Radiat Oncol Investig, V6, P135
[7]  
Emanuele NV, 1997, GERIATRICS, V52, P40
[8]   Urinary morbidity following ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate seed implantation [J].
Gelblum, DY ;
Potters, L ;
Ashley, R ;
Waldbaum, R ;
Wang, XH ;
Leibel, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (01) :59-67
[9]   DETAILED PRELIMINARY-ANALYSIS OF I-125 IMPLANTATION FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER USING PERCUTANEOUS APPROACH [J].
KAYE, KW ;
OLSON, DJ ;
PAYNE, JT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :1020-1025
[10]   Factors predicting for postimplantation urinary retention after permanent prostate brachytherapy [J].
Lee, N ;
Wuu, CS ;
Brody, R ;
Laguna, JL ;
Katz, AE ;
Bagiella, E ;
Ennis, RD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (05) :1457-1460