A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder -: The GAD-7

被引:22118
作者
Spitzer, Robert L.
Kroenke, Kurt
Williams, Janet B. W.
Loewe, Bernd
机构
[1] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Biometr Res Dept, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Regenstrief Inst Hlth Care, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Psychosomat & Gen Internal Med, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. Results: A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short- Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self- report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. Conclusion: The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
引用
收藏
页码:1092 / 1097
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
[2]  
Antony M. M., 2001, PRACTITIONERS GUIDE
[3]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING CLINICAL ANXIETY - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES [J].
BECK, AT ;
BROWN, G ;
EPSTEIN, N ;
STEER, RA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 56 (06) :893-897
[4]   The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - An updated literature review [J].
Bjelland, I ;
Dahl, AA ;
Haug, TT ;
Neckelmann, D .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2002, 52 (02) :69-77
[5]   One-year prevalence of subthreshold and threshold DSM-IV generalized anxiety disorder in a nationally representative sample [J].
Carter, RM ;
Wittchen, HU ;
Pfister, H ;
Kessler, RC .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2001, 13 (02) :78-88
[6]   COMMON AND SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS OF SELF-REPORTED ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE COGNITIVE AND TRIPARTITE MODELS [J].
CLARK, DA ;
STEER, RA ;
BECK, AT .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 103 (04) :645-654
[7]  
Derogatis L R, 1974, Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry, V7, P79
[8]   REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES - STATISTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHR, P ;
PATRICK, DL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S142-S158
[9]  
First M.B., 2002, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P)
[10]   Generalized anxiety disorder [J].
Fricchione, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (07) :675-682