Adsorption of sugar beet herbicides to Finnish soils

被引:48
|
作者
Autio, S
Siimes, K
Laitinen, P
Rämö, S
Oinonen, S
Eronen, L
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[2] Agrifood Res Finland, Plant Prod Res, Jokioinen 31600, Finland
[3] Agrifood Res Finland, Chem Lab, Jokioinen 31600, Finland
[4] Sugar Beet Res Ctr, Kotalato 25170, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
ethofumesate; glufosinate-ammonium; glyphosate; phenmedipham; metamitron; batch equilibrium test;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three sugar beet herbicides, ethofumesate, phenmedipham and metamitron, are currently used on conventional sugar beet cultivation, while new varieties of herbicide resistant (HR) sugar beet, tolerant of glyphosate or glufosinate-ammonium, are under field testing in Finland. Little knowledge has so far been available on the adsorption of these herbicides to Finnish soils. The adsorption of these five herbicides was studied using the batch equilibrium method in 21 soil samples collected from different depths. Soil properties like organic carbon content, texture, pH and partly the phosphorus and oxide content of the soils were tested against the adsorption coefficients of the herbicides. In general, the herbicides studied could be arranged according to their adsorption coefficients as follows: glyphosate>phenmedipham>ethofumesateapproximate toglufosinate-ammonium>metamitron, metamitron meaning the highest risk of leaching. None of the measured soil parameters could alone explain the adsorption mechanism of these five herbicides. The results can be used in model assessments of risk for leaching to ground water resulting from weed control of sugar beet in Finland. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 226
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors affecting recent trends in sugar beet yields and implications for sugarcane productivity
    Jaggard, Keith
    Rosbrook, Trish
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 2020, 122 (1454): : 114 - 119
  • [42] Transgenic sugar beet tolerant to imidazolinone obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation
    E. M. Kishchenko
    I. K. Komarnitskii
    N. V. Kuchuk
    Cytology and Genetics, 2011, 45 : 148 - 152
  • [43] Remote Sensing for Assessing Rhizoctonia Crown and Root Rot Severity in Sugar Beet
    Reynolds, Gregory J.
    Windels, Carol E.
    MacRae, Ian V.
    Laguette, Soizik
    PLANT DISEASE, 2012, 96 (04) : 497 - 505
  • [44] Residual Phytotoxicity Effects of Paraquat, Glyphosate and Glufosinate-Ammonium Herbicides in Soils from Field-Treated Plots
    Wibawa, Wahyu
    Bin Mohamad, Rosli
    Bin Puteh, Adam
    Omar, Dzolkhifli
    Juraimi, Abdul Shukor
    Abdullah, Sheikh Awadz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 11 (02) : 214 - 216
  • [45] ADSORPTION AND DESORPTION OF GLYPHOSATE IN SOME EUROPEAN SOILS
    PICCOLO, A
    CELANO, G
    ARIENZO, M
    MIRABELLA, A
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 1994, 29 (06) : 1105 - 1115
  • [46] SCREENING DIFFERENT SUGAR BEET (BETA VULGARIS L.) GENOTYPES TOLERANCE TO GLYPHOSATE
    El-Aal, A. M. Abd
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 751 - 754
  • [47] Evaluation of two chemical weed control systems in sugar beet in Germany and the Russian Federation
    Bezhin, K.
    Santel, H. -J.
    Gerhards, R.
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 61 (11) : 489 - 495
  • [48] VELVETLEAF (ABUTILON-THEOPHRASTI) CONTROL IN SUGAR-BEET (BETA-VULGARIS)
    RENNER, KA
    POWELL, GE
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 5 (01) : 97 - 102
  • [49] The effect of root-absorbed PSII inhibitors on Kautsky curve parameters in sugar beet
    Abbaspoor, M
    Teicher, H
    Streibig, J
    WEED RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (03) : 226 - 235
  • [50] Performance evaluation of an automated detection and control system for volunteer potatoes in sugar beet fields
    Nieuwenhuizen, A. T.
    Hofstee, J. W.
    van Henten, E. J.
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2010, 107 (01) : 46 - 53