Adsorption of sugar beet herbicides to Finnish soils

被引:48
|
作者
Autio, S
Siimes, K
Laitinen, P
Rämö, S
Oinonen, S
Eronen, L
机构
[1] Finnish Environm Inst, Helsinki 00251, Finland
[2] Agrifood Res Finland, Plant Prod Res, Jokioinen 31600, Finland
[3] Agrifood Res Finland, Chem Lab, Jokioinen 31600, Finland
[4] Sugar Beet Res Ctr, Kotalato 25170, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
ethofumesate; glufosinate-ammonium; glyphosate; phenmedipham; metamitron; batch equilibrium test;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.10.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three sugar beet herbicides, ethofumesate, phenmedipham and metamitron, are currently used on conventional sugar beet cultivation, while new varieties of herbicide resistant (HR) sugar beet, tolerant of glyphosate or glufosinate-ammonium, are under field testing in Finland. Little knowledge has so far been available on the adsorption of these herbicides to Finnish soils. The adsorption of these five herbicides was studied using the batch equilibrium method in 21 soil samples collected from different depths. Soil properties like organic carbon content, texture, pH and partly the phosphorus and oxide content of the soils were tested against the adsorption coefficients of the herbicides. In general, the herbicides studied could be arranged according to their adsorption coefficients as follows: glyphosate>phenmedipham>ethofumesateapproximate toglufosinate-ammonium>metamitron, metamitron meaning the highest risk of leaching. None of the measured soil parameters could alone explain the adsorption mechanism of these five herbicides. The results can be used in model assessments of risk for leaching to ground water resulting from weed control of sugar beet in Finland. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 226
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biological effectiveness the mixture of herbicides for sugar beet
    Deveikyte, I
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ESTONIAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VOL 209, 2000, 209 : 28 - 30
  • [2] Joint action of some broadleaf herbicides in sugar beet
    Chitband, Ali Asghar
    Ghorbani, Reza
    Mohassel, Mohammad Hassan Rashed
    Nabizade, Mahbubeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEST MANAGEMENT, 2021, 67 (03) : 179 - 186
  • [3] Differential sensitivity of Atriplex patula and Chenopodium album to sugar beet herbicides: a possible cause for the upsurge of A-patula in sugar beet fields
    De Cauwer, B.
    Cardinael, A.
    Claerhout, S.
    Manderyck, B.
    Reheul, D.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2018, 58 (02) : 99 - 111
  • [4] NEW HERBICIDES FOR POSTEMERGENCE APPLICATION IN SUGAR-BEET (BETA-VULGARIS)
    WILSON, RG
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1994, 8 (04) : 807 - 811
  • [5] EFFECT OF VARIOUS WEATHER CONDITIONS ON SELECTIVITY OF POST-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES IN SUGAR BEET
    Hamouzova, Katerina
    Jursik, Miroslav
    Zabransky, Petr
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2013, 129 (7-8): : 224 - 228
  • [6] Glyphosate adsorption in soils compared to herbicides replaced with the introduction of glyphosate resistant crops
    Mamy, L
    Barriuso, E
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2005, 61 (06) : 844 - 855
  • [7] Utilization of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Imaging Technology to Detect Plant Injury by Herbicides in Sugar Beet and Soybean
    Weber, Jonas F.
    Kunz, Christoph
    Peteinatos, Gerassimos G.
    Santel, Hans-Joachim
    Gerhards, Roland
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (04) : 523 - 535
  • [8] Sugar beet varieties tolerant to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: A novel tool in weed management
    Jursik, Miroslav
    Soukup, Josef
    Kolarova, Michaela
    CROP PROTECTION, 2020, 137
  • [9] ROLE OF NEW HERBICIDES IN DODDER (CUSCUTA CAMPESTRIS) CONTROL IN SUGAR BEET (BETA VULGARIS) FIELDS
    Hoseyni, S. M.
    Najafi, H.
    Sani, B.
    Mozafari, H.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (04): : 5117 - 5125
  • [10] Twister (Goltix Super) - a new herbicide for weed control in sugar beet
    Kalfa, AV
    Heckl, W
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENKRANKHEITEN UND PFLANZENSCHUTZ-JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2004, : 675 - 683