The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis

被引:561
作者
Chase, JM [1 ]
Abrams, PA
Grover, JP
Diehl, S
Chesson, P
Holt, RD
Richards, SA
Nisbet, RM
Case, TJ
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biol Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Zool, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Texas, Dept Biol, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[4] Univ Munich, Dept Zool, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Sect Ecol & Evolut, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Dept Zool, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[7] Natl Ctr Ecol Anal & Synth, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Ecol Evolut & Marine Biol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[9] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Biol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
coexistence; diversity; herbivory; interaction strength; interspecific competition; predation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00315.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This review discusses the interface between two of the most important types of interactions between species, interspecific competition and predation. Predation has been claimed to increase, decrease, or have little effect on, the strength, impact or importance of interspecific competition. There is confusion about both the meaning these terms and the likelihood of, and conditions required for, each of these outcomes. In this article we distinguish among three measures of the influence of predation on competitive outcomes: short-term per capita consumption or growth rates, long-term changes in density and the probability of competitive coexistence. We then outline various theoretical mechanisms that can lead to qualitatively, distinct effects. of predators,. The qualitative effect of predators can depend both on the mechanism of competition and on the definition of competitive strength/impact. In assessing the empirical literature, we ask: (1) What definitions of competitive strength/impact have been assumed? (2) Does strong evidence exist to support one or more of the possible mechanisms that can produce a given outcome? (3) Do biases in the choice of organism or manipulation exist, and are they, likely, to have influenced the conclusions reached? We conclude by discussing several unanswered questions, and espouse a stronger interchange between empirical and theoretical approaches to this important question.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 315
页数:14
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice [J].
Abrams, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1999, 153 (01) :83-97
[2]   Is predator-mediated coexistence possible in unstable systems? [J].
Abrams, PA .
ECOLOGY, 1999, 80 (02) :608-621
[4]   EFFECT OF INCREASED PRODUCTIVITY ON THE ABUNDANCES OF TROPHIC LEVELS [J].
ABRAMS, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1993, 141 (03) :351-371
[5]   High competition with low similarity and low competition with high similarity: Exploitative and apparent competition in consumer-resource systems [J].
Abrams, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1998, 152 (01) :114-128
[6]   Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approaches [J].
Abrams, PA .
OIKOS, 2001, 94 (02) :209-218
[7]   HOW SHOULD RESOURCES BE COUNTED [J].
ABRAMS, PA .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1988, 33 (02) :226-242
[8]   CONSUMER FUNCTIONAL-RESPONSE AND COMPETITION IN CONSUMER-RESOURCE SYSTEMS [J].
ABRAMS, PA .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1980, 17 (01) :80-102
[9]   The effect of density-independent mortality on the coexistence of exploitative competitors for renewing resources [J].
Abrams, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2001, 158 (05) :459-470
[10]   DENSITY-INDEPENDENT MORTALITY AND INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION - TEST OF PIANKAS NICHE OVERLAP HYPOTHESIS [J].
ABRAMS, PA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1977, 111 (979) :539-552