Fake news and fake research: Why meta-research matters more than ever

被引:1
作者
McGee, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Dawson, Amanda C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Cent Coast Clin Sch, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
[2] Gosford Hosp, Dept Pediat, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Gosford Hosp, Dept Surg, Gosford, NSW, Australia
关键词
evidence-based medicine; meta-research; research method; scientific method; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; HEALTH RESEARCH; CHILD HEALTH; REGISTRATION; OUTCOMES; BURDEN; WASTE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/jpc.15237
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Research is in a crisis of credibility, and this is to the peril of all paediatricians. Billions of dollars are being wasted each year because research is not planned, badly conducted or poorly reported, and this is on a background of rapidly reducing research budgets. How can paediatricians, families and patients make informed treatment choices if the evidence base is absent or not trustworthy? This article discusses why meta-research now matters more than ever, how it can help solve this crisis of credibility and how this should lead to more efficient and effective clinical care. The field of meta-research or research-on-research is the ultimate big picture approach to identifying and solving issues of bias, error, misconduct and waste in research. Meta-researchers value authenticity over aesthetics and quality over quantity. The utility of meta-research does not rely on accusations or critical assessments of individual research, but through highlighting where and how the scientific method and research standards across all fields can be improved. Meta-researchers study, analyse and critique the research pathway, focusing on elements such as methods (how to conduct), evaluation (how to test), reporting (how to communicate), reproducibility (how to verify) and incentives (how to reward). In the current climate it is now more critical than ever that we make use of meta-research and prioritise high-quality high-impact research, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1868 / 1871
页数:4
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Policies regarding public availability of published research data in pediatrics journals [J].
Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael ;
Ferrer Sapena, Antonia ;
Coronado Ferrer, Silvia ;
Peset, Fernanda ;
Garcia Garcia, Alicia .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2019, 118 (02) :439-451
[2]   Retire statistical significance [J].
Amrhein, Valentin ;
Greenland, Sander ;
McShane, Blake .
NATURE, 2019, 567 (7748) :305-307
[3]  
Beard DJ, 2020, LANCET, V395, P828, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33137-X
[5]   Primary Outcomes Reporting in Trials (PORTal): a systematic review of inadequate reporting in pediatric randomized controlled trials [J].
Bhaloo, Zafira ;
Adams, Denise ;
Liu, Yali ;
Hansraj, Namrata ;
Hartling, Lisa ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Vohra, Sunita .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 81 :33-41
[6]  
Bialy Liza, 2014, Evid Based Child Health, V9, P1052, DOI 10.1002/ebch.1985
[7]   Association Between Pediatric Clinical Trials and Global Burden of Disease [J].
Bourgeois, Florence T. ;
Olson, Karen L. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Mandl, Kenneth D. .
PEDIATRICS, 2014, 133 (01) :78-87
[8]   Pediatric Versus Adult Drug Trials for Conditions With High Pediatric Disease Burden [J].
Bourgeois, Florence T. ;
Murthy, Srinivas ;
Pinto, Catia ;
Olson, Karen L. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Mandl, Kenneth D. .
PEDIATRICS, 2012, 130 (02) :285-292
[9]   Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately [J].
Caulley, Lisa ;
Catala-Lopez, Ferran ;
Whelan, Jonathan ;
Khoury, Michel ;
Ferraro, Jennifer ;
Cheng, Wei ;
Husereau, Don ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Moher, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 122 :87-94
[10]   How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set [J].
Chalmers, Iain ;
Bracken, Michael B. ;
Djulbegovic, Ben ;
Garattini, Silvio ;
Grant, Jonathan ;
Guelmezoglu, A. Metin ;
Howells, David W. ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. ;
Oliver, Sandy .
LANCET, 2014, 383 (9912) :156-165