If Slow Rate Of Health Care Spending Growth Persists, Projections May Be Off By $770 Billion

被引:45
作者
Cutler, David M. [1 ]
Sahni, Nikhil R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; READMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0289
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite earlier forecasts to the contrary, US health care spending growth has slowed in the past four years, continuing a trend that began in the early 2000s. In this article we attempt to identify why US health care spending growth has slowed, and we explore the spending implications if the trend continues for the next decade. We find that the 2007-09 recession, a one-time event, accounted for 37 percent of the slowdown between 2003 and 2012. A decline in private insurance coverage and cuts to some Medicare payment rates accounted for another 8 percent of the slowdown, leaving 55 percent of the spending slowdown unexplained. We conclude that a host of fundamental changes-including less rapid development of imaging technology and new pharmaceuticals, increased patient cost sharing, and greater provider efficiency-were responsible for the majority of the slowdown in spending growth. If these trends continue during 2013-22, public-sector health care spending will be as much as $770 billion less than predicted. Such lower levels of spending would have an enormous impact on the US economy and on government and household finances.
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 850
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
American Hospital Association, 2011, TRENDS AFF HOSP HLTH
[2]   Failure to launch [J].
不详 .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (01) :1-1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CURRENT POPULATION R
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right
[5]  
[Anonymous], EMPL HLTH BEN 2012 A
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Report to the Congress: Promoting greater efficiency in Medicare, Orszag, J. Orszag
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EMPL HLTH BEN 2011 A
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, CAS SHILL US NAT HOM
[9]  
BARR P, 2011, MOD HEALTHCARE 0725, P10
[10]  
Berndt ER, 2000, HANDB ECON, V17, P119