Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on latex and silicone T-tubes in relation to bacterial contamination of bile

被引:11
作者
Koivusalo, A
Makisalo, H
Talja, M
Siitonen, A
VuopioVarkila, J
Ruutu, M
Hockerstedt, K
机构
[1] HELSINKI UNIV,CENT HOSP,DEPT SURG 4,HELSINKI,FINLAND
[2] HELSINKI UNIV,CENT HOSP,DEPT UROL,HELSINKI,FINLAND
[3] PAIJAT HAME CENT HOSP,HELSINKI,FINLAND
[4] NATL PUBL HLTH INST,LAB HOSP INFECT,HELSINKI,FINLAND
关键词
bacteriobilia; biofilm; T-tubes;
D O I
10.3109/00365529609006417
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: T-tube-related bacteriobilia causes infectious complications and obstruction. To prevent these, the choice of T-tube material may be of importance. Methods: Transected common bile ducts (CBDs) of 17 piglets were sutured over latex or silicone T-tubes, or without a T-tube. Results: After 6 weeks bacteriobilia was found in all of 12 CBDs with and in 1 of 5 CBDs without a T-tube (p < 0.05). By scanning electron microscopy (SEM) four of five latex and none of five silicone T-tubes had bacterial biofilms (p < 0.05). All tubes remained patent. Segments of T-tubes were incubated with five different bacterial strains. Sonication and SEM showed that 0.1-1.1% of 10(7) colony-forming units of inoculum adhered to T-tubes. Two to six times more bacteria adhered to latex than to silicone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Silicone offers better long-term patency than latex. Less infectious complications occur if T-tubes are omitted.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 403
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   TECHNIQUES FOR THE PRESERVATION OF 3-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE IN PREPARING SPECIMENS FOR THE ELECTRON MICROSCOPE [J].
ANDERSON, TF .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1951, 13 (04) :130-134
[2]  
BALOWS A, 1991, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO, P1
[3]  
COENE PPL, 1940, GUT, V31, P913
[4]   BACTERIAL BIOFILMS IN NATURE AND DISEASE [J].
COSTERTON, JW ;
CHENG, KJ ;
GEESEY, GG ;
LADD, TI ;
NICKEL, JC ;
DASGUPTA, M ;
MARRIE, TJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1987, 41 :435-464
[5]   CLOGGING AND OTHER COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC BILIARY ENDOPROSTHESES [J].
DOWIDAR, N ;
MOESGAARD, F ;
MATZEN, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 26 (11) :1132-1136
[6]  
FERETIS CB, 1984, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V159, P363
[7]  
GEO W, 1993, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V28, P393
[8]  
Geoghegan JG., 1991, GUT, V37, P257
[9]  
GILLAT DA, 1985, ANN R COLL SURG ENGL, V67, P670
[10]  
LARY BG, 1952, SURGERY, V32, P789