Comparison of Gram and Kopeloff stains in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy

被引:12
|
作者
Libman, MD
Kramer, M
Platt, R
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Microbiol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Div Infect Dis, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ H3H 1P3, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A2, Canada
关键词
gram stain; Kopeloff stains; Nugent score; bacterial vaginosis; pregnancy;
D O I
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.09.017
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is commonly diagnosed by using the Nugent score, a semiquantitative scoring system to evaluate bacterial morphotypes on Grain stain of vaginal secretions. Some authors have suggested using the Kopeloff modification of the Grain stain. Asymptomatic BV in pregnancy has been associated with adverse outcomes. We performed both stains on simultaneously collected vaginal smears froth 2652 women at 24-26 weeks of gestation. Gram staining gave significantly higher (more abnormal) Nugent scores than Kopeloff staining. Compared to the Kopeloff stain, the number of specimens graded as indeterminate or consistent with BV by Gram stain increased by 29% (469 versus 364, P <.001). Interrater reliability of the Nugent score (n = 413) for Kopeloff staining was significantly better than Grain staining (agreement = 74% versus 63%, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.87 versus 0.79, P <.05, 95% confidence intervals 0.85-0.89 and 0.75-0.82, respectively). (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 201
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of Bacterial Vaginosis with Vitamin D in Pregnancy: Secondary Analysis from the Kellogg Pregnancy Study
    Powell, Anna Maya
    Shary, Judy R.
    Louden, Christopher
    Ramakrishnan, Vishwanathan
    Eckard, Allison Ross
    Wagner, Carol L.
    AJP REPORTS, 2019, 9 (03): : E226 - E234
  • [22] Routine pap smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
    Prey, M
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 21 (01) : 10 - 13
  • [23] Bacterial vaginosis: diagnosis and treatment
    Wielgos, Miroslaw
    Pietrzak, Bronislawa
    MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2012, 11 (05): : 356 - 363
  • [24] Microbiological diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
    Barberis, IL
    Pájaro, MC
    Godino, S
    Pascual, L
    Daniele, M
    ACTA BIOQUIMICA CLINICA LATINOAMERICANA, 2002, 36 (04): : 541 - 545
  • [25] Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in cases of abnormal vaginal discharge: comparison of clinical and microbiological criteria
    Modak, Tamonud
    Arora, Preeti
    Agnes, Charan
    Ray, Raja
    Goswami, Sebanti
    Ghosh, Pramit
    Das, Nilay Kanti
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2011, 5 (05): : 353 - 360
  • [26] Clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
    Simoes, J. A.
    Discacciati, M. G.
    Brolazo, E. M.
    Portugal, P. M.
    Dini, D. V.
    Dantas, M. C. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 94 (01) : 28 - 32
  • [27] Ingestion of probiotics: Optional treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy
    Shalev, E
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2002, 4 (05): : 357 - 360
  • [28] Interobserver variation in the interpretation of Nugent scoring method for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis
    Mohanty, Srujana
    Sood, Seema
    Kapil, Arti
    Mittal, Suneeta
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 131 (01) : 88 - 91
  • [29] Correlation between bacterial vaginosis and adverse pregnancy outcome
    Diejomaoh, MFE
    Rotimi, VO
    Omu, AE
    Fernandes, S
    Al-Sweih, NA
    Al-Yatama, M
    Malik, S
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 1999, 8 (03) : 222 - 229
  • [30] Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Gordon, Adrienne
    Heatley, Emer
    Milan, Stephen J.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (01):