Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete

被引:516
作者
Yang, Keun-Hyeok [1 ]
Song, Jin-Kyu [2 ]
Song, Keum-Il [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyonggi Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Kyonggi Do 443760, South Korea
[2] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Architectural Engn, Kwangju, Chonnam, South Korea
关键词
Alkali-activated concrete; Binder intensity; CO2; intensity; LCI database; Precast concrete products;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Although alkali-activated (AA) concrete is generally regarded as one of the most effective concrete technologies for reducing CO2 emissions, very few investigations have been carried out on the assessment of the CO2 reduction of such concrete. The present paper reports an evaluation procedure for the CO2 reduction of AA concrete. The studied system considers all of the steps from the cradle to preconstruction. CO2 reduction for secondary precast concrete products is also evaluated with reference to practical examples wherein ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) cement is replaced with AA GGBS binder. Comparisons of the performance efficiency indicators, binder and CO2 intensities, reveal that the contribution of the binder to the total CO2 emission is more significant in ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-based concrete than in AA concrete, whereas the contribution of aggregate transportation becomes more critical in AA concrete than in OPC-based concrete. The reduction rate of CO2 emission of AA concrete relative to OPC concrete commonly ranges between 55 and 75%. In addition, the CO2 reduction rate in secondary precast concrete products that use AA GGBS binder instead of GGBS cement can be evaluated as approximately 20% when the total aggregate-to-binder ratio ranges between 3.0 and 4.0. On the other hand, Ca(OH)(2)-based AA GGBS concrete shows a CO2 intensity that is approximately 2.4 times lower than that of OPC concrete. Overall, the slope of the increasing rate of the CO2 intensity against the binder intensity is lower in Ca(OH)(2)-based AA GGBS concrete than in OPC-based concrete. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 272
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Cements of yesterday and today -: Concrete of tomorrow
    Aïtcin, PC
    [J]. CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2000, 30 (09) : 1349 - 1359
  • [2] Ali MB, 2001, RENEW SUST ENERG REV, V15, P2252
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2004, TASK GROUP 3 3 ENV D
  • [4] [Anonymous], KOR IND STAND
  • [5] Measuring the eco-efficiency of cement use
    Damineli, Bruno L.
    Kemeid, Fernanda M.
    Aguiar, Patricia S.
    John, Vanderley M.
    [J]. CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2010, 32 (08) : 555 - 562
  • [6] Davidovits J., 1993, CERAMIC T VOL 37, V37, P165
  • [7] Davidovits J., 2008, GEOPOLYMER CHEM APPL
  • [8] Geopolymer technology:: the current state of the art
    Duxson, P.
    Fernandez-Jimenez, A.
    Provis, J. L.
    Lukey, G. C.
    Palomo, A.
    van Deventer, J. S. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2007, 42 (09) : 2917 - 2933
  • [9] Industrially interesting approaches to "low-CO2" cements
    Gartner, E
    [J]. CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2004, 34 (09) : 1489 - 1498
  • [10] Malhotra V.M., 2002, ACI CONCRETE INT, V24, P22, DOI DOI 10.4236/WJET.2017.53034