A Little Flexibility Is All You Need: On the Asymptotic Value of Flexible Capacity in Parallel Queuing Systems

被引:41
作者
Bassamboo, Achal [1 ]
Randhawa, Ramandeep S. [2 ]
Van Mieghem, Jan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60203 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
关键词
MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS; SERVICE; DESIGN; INVESTMENT; BENEFITS; QUEUES;
D O I
10.1287/opre.1120.1107
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We analytically study optimal capacity and flexible technology selection in parallel queuing systems. We consider N stochastic arrival streams that may wait in N queues before being processed by one of many resources (technologies) that differ in their flexibility. A resource's ability to process k different arrival types or classes is referred to as level-k flexibility. We determine the capacity portfolio (consisting of all resources at all levels of flexibility) that minimizes linear capacity and linear holding costs in high-volume systems where the arrival rate lambda -> infinity. We prove that "a little flexibility is all you need": the optimal portfolio invests O(lambda) in specialized resources and only O(root lambda) in flexible resources and these optimal capacity choices bring the system into heavy traffic. Further, considering symmetric systems (with type-independent parameters), a novel "folding" methodology allows the specification of the asymptotic queue count process for any capacity portfolio under longest-queue scheduling in closed form that is amenable to optimization. This allows us to sharpen "a little flexibility is all you need": the asymptotically optimal flexibility configuration for symmetric systems with mild economies of scope invests a lot in specialized resources but only a little in flexible resources and only in level-2 flexibility, but effectively nothing (o(root lambda)) in level-k > 2 flexibility. We characterize "tailored pairing" as the theoretical benchmark configuration that maximizes the value of flexibility when demand and service uncertainty are the main concerns. Subject classifications: flexibility; capacity optimization; queueing network; diffusion approximation. Area of review: Manufacturing, Service, and Supply Chain Operations. History: Received June 2009; revisions received November 2010, October 2011, May 2012; accepted July 2012.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1435
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Server assignment policies for maximizing the steady-state throughput of finite queueing systems
    Andradóttir, S
    Ayhan, H
    Down, DG
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (10) : 1421 - 1439
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, Fundamentals of Queueing Networks: Performance, Asymptotics, and Optimization
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1976, Queueing Systems, Volume II
  • [4] Optimal Flexibility Configurations in Newsvendor Networks: Going Beyond Chaining and Pairing
    Bassamboo, Achal
    Randhawa, Ramandeep S.
    Van Mieghem, Jan A.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (08) : 1285 - 1303
  • [5] Operational Flexibility and Financial Hedging: Complements or Substitutes?
    Chod, Jiri
    Rudi, Nils
    Van Mieghem, Jan A.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (06) : 1030 - 1045
  • [6] On range and response: Dimensions of process flexibility
    Chou, Mabel C.
    Chua, Geoffrey A.
    Teo, Chung-Piaw
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2010, 207 (02) : 711 - 724
  • [7] Process flexibility: design, evaluation, and applications
    Chou, Mabel C.
    Teo, Chung-Piaw
    Zheng, Huan
    [J]. FLEXIBLE SERVICES AND MANUFACTURING JOURNAL, 2008, 20 (1-2) : 59 - 94
  • [8] Design for Process Flexibility: Efficiency of the Long Chain and Sparse Structure
    Chou, Mabel C.
    Chua, Geoffrey A.
    Teo, Chung-Piaw
    Zheng, Huan
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (01) : 43 - 58
  • [9] OPTIMAL INVESTMENT IN PRODUCT-FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING CAPACITY
    FINE, CH
    FREUND, RM
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (04) : 449 - 466
  • [10] Process flexibility in supply chains
    Graves, SC
    Tomlin, BT
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (07) : 907 - 919