Does Technology Trust Substitute Interpersonal Trust? Examining Technology Trust's Influence on Individual Decision-Making

被引:16
作者
Li, Xin [1 ]
Rong, Guang [2 ]
Thatcher, Jason B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Business, St Petersburg, FL 33701 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Dept Management, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
关键词
Institutional Trust; Interpersonal Trust; Purchase Intention; Technology Trust; Technology Trust Substitutes; E-COMMERCE; MODEL; QUALITY; MARKETPLACES; EXCHANGES; INTENTION; ADOPTION; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.4018/joeuc.2012040102
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
While an increasing number of trust studies examine technological artifacts as trust recipients, there is still a lack of basic understanding of how technology trust relates to traditional trust and its role within the broader nomological net articulated in trust research. This paper suggests that technology trust is distinct from interpersonal trust (i.e., trust in humans) due to the different core characteristics of the trustees. To examine these differences, the authors first develop and validate a measure of technology trust comprised of IT-specific belief sources. Then, they articulate a research model that compares and contrasts technology trust and interpersonal trust. This study provides evidence that technology trust is associated with, yet distinct from, interpersonal trust. The authors found technology trust plays a dual role in the nomological net tied to individual intended behavior - exerting a direct and an indirect influence on a trust outcome. Rather than suggesting that technology trust substitutes for interpersonal trust, the findings suggest that technology trust complements interpersonal trust in affecting purchase intention.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 38
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage [J].
Agarwal, R ;
Karahanna, E .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2000, 24 (04) :665-694
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Psychometric Theory
[3]   THE PROBABILITY FUNCTION OF THE PRODUCT OF 2 NORMALLY DISTRIBUTED VARIABLES [J].
AROIAN, LA .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1947, 18 (02) :265-271
[4]  
Benbasat I., 2005, J ASSOC INF SYST, V6, P72, DOI [DOI 10.17705/1JAIS.00065, https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00065]
[5]  
Bhattacherjee A, 2002, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V19, P211
[6]  
Chin WW, 1998, MIS QUART, V22, pVII
[7]   Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model [J].
Chwelos, P ;
Benbasat, I ;
Dexter, AS .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (03) :304-321
[8]  
Corbitt B., 2003, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, V2, P203, DOI [10.1016/S1567-4223, DOI 10.1016/S1567-4223, 10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00024-3, DOI 10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00024-3]
[9]   Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development [J].
Diamantopoulos, A ;
Winklhofer, HM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (02) :269-277
[10]   EVALUATING STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR [J].
FORNELL, C ;
LARCKER, DF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1981, 18 (01) :39-50