Evaluation of a clinical decision support algorithm for patient-specific childhood immunization

被引:10
|
作者
Zhu, Vivienne J. [1 ,2 ]
Grannis, Shaun J. [1 ,2 ]
Tu, Wanzhu [1 ,2 ]
Rosenman, Marc B. [1 ,2 ]
Downs, Stephen M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Regenstrief Inst Inc, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Childrens Hlth Res Serv, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
Clinical decision support system; Electronic medical record; Childhood immunization; GUIDELINE KNOWLEDGE MAINTENANCE; REMINDER/RECALL INTERVENTIONS; UNITED-STATES; CARE; GENERATION; RATES; TOOLS; LOGIC;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2012.04.004
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) implementing standard childhood immunization guidelines, using real-world patient data from the Regenstrief Medical Record System (RMRS). Methods: Study subjects were age 6-years or younger in 2008 and had visited the pediatric clinic on the campus of Wishard Memorial Hospital. Immunization records were retrieved from the RMRS for 135 randomly selected pediatric patients. We compared vaccine recommendations from the CDSS for both eligible and recommended timelines, based on the child's date of birth and vaccine history, to recommendations from registered nurses who routinely selected vaccines for administration in a busy inner city hospital, using the same date of birth and vaccine history. Aggregated and stratified agreement and Kappa statistics were reported. The reasons for disagreement between suggestions from the CDSS and nurses were also identified. Results: For the 135 children, a total of 1215 vaccination suggestions were generated by nurses and were compared to the recommendations of the CDSS. The overall agreement rates were 81.3% and 90.6% for the eligible and recommended timelines, respectively. The overall Kappa values were 0.63 for the eligible timeline and 0.80 for the recommended timeline. Common reasons for disagreement between the CDSS and nurses were: (1) missed vaccination opportunities by nurses, (2) nurses sometimes suggested a vaccination before the minimal age and minimal waiting interval, (3) nurses usually did not validate patient immunization history, and (4) nurses sometimes gave an extra vaccine dose. Conclusion: Our childhood immunization CDSS can assist providers in delivering accurate childhood vaccinations. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Strategy to Increase Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among Hospitalized Children Before Inpatient Discharge
    Orenstein, Evan W.
    ElSayed-Ali, Omar
    Kandaswamy, Swaminathan
    Masterson, Erin
    Blanco, Reena
    Shah, Pareen
    Lantis, Patricia
    Kolwaite, Amy
    Dawson, Thomas E.
    Ray, Edwin
    Bryant, Christy
    Iyer, Srikant
    Shane, Andi L.
    Jernigan, Stephanie
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (07)
  • [42] Consensus Recommendations for Systematic Evaluation of Drug–Drug Interaction Evidence for Clinical Decision Support
    Richard T. Scheife
    Lisa E. Hines
    Richard D. Boyce
    Sophie P. Chung
    Jeremiah D. Momper
    Christine D. Sommer
    Darrell R. Abernethy
    John R. Horn
    Stephen J. Sklar
    Samantha K. Wong
    Gretchen Jones
    Mary L. Brown
    Amy J. Grizzle
    Susan Comes
    Tricia Lee Wilkins
    Clarissa Borst
    Michael A. Wittie
    Daniel C. Malone
    Drug Safety, 2015, 38 : 197 - 206
  • [43] Barriers to the Use of Clinical Decision Support for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Embolism: Qualitative Interview Study
    Richardson, Safiya
    Dauber-Decker, Katherine L.
    McGinn, Thomas
    Barnaby, Douglas P.
    Cattamanchi, Adithya
    Pekmezaris, Renee
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2021, 8 (03):
  • [44] Evaluation of User-Interface Alert Displays for Clinical Decision Support Systems for Sepsis
    Long, Devida
    Capan, Muge
    Mascioli, Susan
    Weldon, Danielle
    Arnold, Ryan
    Miller, Kristen
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2018, 38 (04) : 46 - 54
  • [45] A Clinical Decision Support System for Assessing the Risk of Cervical Cancer: Development and Evaluation Study
    Chekin, Nasrin
    Ayatollahi, Haleh
    Zarchi, Mojgan Karimi
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 10 (06)
  • [46] Clinical decision support software for diabetic foot risk stratification: development and formative evaluation
    Schoen, Deborah E.
    Glance, David G.
    Thompson, Sandra C.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2015, 8
  • [47] The effects of cancer clinical decision support systems on patient-reported outcomes: A systematic review
    Pitt, Erin
    Bradford, Natalie
    Robertson, Eden
    Sansom-Daly, Ursula M.
    Alexander, Kimberly
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 66
  • [48] Intelligent Clinical Decision Support Systems for Patient-Centered Healthcare in Breast Cancer Oncology
    Sekar, Boomadevi
    Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
    Muro, Naiara
    Ugarriza Pinedo, Amaia
    Seroussi, Brigitte
    Larburu, Nekane
    Guezennec, Gilles
    Bouaud, Jacques
    Guijarro Masero, Frank
    Arrue, Monica
    Wang, Hui
    2018 IEEE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-HEALTH NETWORKING, APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES (HEALTHCOM), 2018,
  • [49] Patient-Like-Mine A Real Time, Visual Analytics Tool for Clinical Decision Support
    Li, Peter
    Yates, Simon N.
    Lovely, Jenna K.
    Larson, David W.
    PROCEEDINGS 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA, 2015, : 2865 - 2867
  • [50] Integration of the Wang & Mendel Algorithm into the Application of Fuzzy Expert Systems to Intelligent Clinical Decision Support Systems
    Casal-Guisande, Manuel
    Cerqueiro-Pequeno, Jorge
    Bouza-Rodriguez, Jose-Benito
    Comesana-Campos, Alberto
    MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (11)